Tom Glavine
Drew Hallowell/Getty Images

Tom Glavine: ‘Even if players were 100% justified, they’re still going to look bad’


The labor struggle between MLB owners and the MLB Players Association has been making headlines for the past month or so. The two sides have reached an impasse as the owners want the players to take an additional pay cut — beyond the one agreed to in March — in the form of 50/50 revenue-sharing. The union, rightly, has balked at the idea, calling it an effective salary cap.

In the history of MLB’s labor struggles, fans have, by and large, taken the side of the owners. Despite the teams being owned by billionaires and each team itself having a valuation of at least $1 billion, the players are seen as spoiled and greedy. Hall of Famer Tom Glavine knows this well, as he was one of the most prominent player representatives for the unions in the 1990’s and was directly involved in negotiations during the 1994-95 strike.

Per Steve Hummer of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Glavine said, “Even if players were 100% justified in what they were complaining about, they’re still going to look bad.”

As Hummer notes, Glavine saw his popularity among fans plummet after becoming a key figure in labor talks in 1994. He won the 1991 NL Cy Young Award, then finished second in ’92 and third in ’93. But because of the strike, Braves fans and the media wouldn’t turn around on him until the lefty tossed eight shutout innings against the Indians in Game 6 of the 1995 World Series, giving the Braves their first championship since 1957 (when they were in Milwaukee).

There has been, essentially, no effective tack players or the union have taken to move public sentiment closer to their side. Even this pandemic, which threatens not only the players’ own health but that of their families and friends, hasn’t affected how fans feel about the players putting their foot down. Rays starter Blake Snell was recently criticized for being blunt, saying on his Twitch stream, “I gotta get my money. I’m not playing unless I get mine, okay?” Snell received a ton of blowback from the media and from fans, but he did receive public support from Phillies outfielder Bryce Harper and Rockies third baseman Nolan Arenado, among others.

One wonders if we will see more players like Snell being staunch about their value going forward, not just as it pertains to starting the 2020 season, but with the December 1, 2021 expiry of the current collective bargaining agreement as well. If the narrative never changes anyway, if “they’re still going to look bad” as Glavine put it, there’s no reason the players should hold back.

As unrest continues, Major League Baseball and its clubs have been mostly silent

Getty Images
Leave a comment

The police killing of George Floyd on May 25 has sparked outrage against police brutality both across the country and around the world. Protests which began in Minneapolis spread to multiple cities over this past weekend. In the saddest of ironies, these protests against the unlawful and excessive use of force has led to police employing even more unlawful and excessive use of force against protesters, most of whom have engaged in peaceful, constitutionally-protected activities. This has all lead to additional deaths, countless injuries, thousands of arrests, and the targeting of journalists by police and government authorities. As of this very moment, that unrest continues.

As Bill noted yesterday, a great many of ballplayers and managers have spoken out against police brutality and in support of those rallying against it. We have heard almost nothing, however, from Major League Baseball and its clubs.

Major League Baseball has issued no official statement in response to the unrest. Only four teams — the Twins, Athletics, Giants, and Blue Jays — have issued statements of their own. The Miami Marlins released a statement from CEO Derek Jeter, but as you can see below, they make a point to say that it’s Jeter’s sentiment, not that of the club. The Dodgers, well, scroll down and we’ll see what they’ve done. It’s kinda awkward. UPDATE: The Mets have just added a statement of their own.

The Twins’ statement on Friday was in specific reference to George Floyd’s killing:

The Blue Jays’ statement is the most recent:

The Giants released this yesterday:

As we noted yesterday, the Oakland A’s paired their statement with the announcement of a charitable donation:

Here’s Derek Jeter, tweeted out by the Marlins, who have made no statement on behalf of the club:

The Mets:

Finally the Dodgers:

That’s obviously not about Floyd’s killing or any of the unrest, but I take that as a tacit acknowledgment of it all and the judgment that maybe today is not a good day for a Zoom party. Which, hey, is better than the 24 other teams whose Twitter feeds, Facebook pages, and websites would have you believe that nothing has happened in the country in the past week.

Contrast that with the NBA which, as of late this morning anyway, has seen 23 of its 30 franchises release a statement on their Twitter feed related to George Floyd’s killing

Not that the five baseball teams who have said something are deserving of full laurels here. Notable in their statements — even in the Twins’ statement which specifically references Floyd — is the complete absence of any reference to law enforcement or police brutality. For that matter, only five of the NBA teams who spoke out specifically mentioned that. One of them is the Washington Wizards. Here’s how easy it is to say such a thing:


Given that the very impetus of the events upon which the teams and leagues are attempting to speak out is the behavior of law enforcement and police brutality, its rather amazing that so few mention it. Indeed, it’s impossible to see these statements as anything other than organizations trying extraordinarily hard not to mention that.

Many of you are probably asking right now (a) why it should matter if professional sports teams or leagues speak out; and (b) if they do, why it should matter if they specifically mention police brutality. Let’s talk about that, shall we?

A broad answer to that is that sports teams and leagues are citizens like the rest of us and are comprised of citizens like the rest of us. They’re important members of the communities in which they play and their leadership and example are important to a great many people. They routinely release statements about things such as natural disasters, global pandemics, notable deaths, and any manner of other of non-sports event which impacts their communities. How massive public uprisings that are clearly affecting many of their own players is mostly given a miss is beyond me.

A more specific answer: the leagues and teams are never hesitant, for one moment, to comment on social progress, including racial progress, when it occurs and when they are a part of it. They are likewise quick to embrace and promote law enforcement when it suits their interests and puts law enforcement in a good light. Most teams host law enforcement appreciation nights, for example. Is it not fair to ask a baseball team that appreciates law enforcement for the good things it does to at least comment on the bad things it does? Is it not fair to ask why they are being so silent in this regard when the behavior of law enforcement is not anything to be appreciated?

One hopes that Major League Baseball’s silence on this matter is one of simple but understandable timidity to weigh in on a matter of such gravity. That the league and its teams are taking their time to craft just the right statements and that, when they got them down perfectly, they’ll be released.

One hopes, in contrast, that their failure to do so as of yet is not a function of their belief that these matters do not affect them, their players, their employees, their fans, and the communities which support them.