AJ Hinch
Getty Images

Why didn’t A.J. Hinch give a firm no when asked about buzzers?


Tom Verducci’s interview with ousted Astros manager AJ Hinch aired on MLB Network last night. It was a pretty standard mea culpa. Hinch said the blame was his for not putting an end to the banging scheme, that he was ashamed, that he wants to manage again some day, and so on. You can watch the whole thing here, if you’ve got a half hour to kill.

There’s one exchange in there I’d like to focus on. It’s arguably the most important part.

VERDUCCI: Now the hindsight of looking at the Astros. People are looking at the Astros in a very different lens based on the Commissioner’s investigation. Which includes now, in their eyes, the 2019 season. We’ve heard reports about the Astros’ players wearing buzzers underneath their uniforms. That’s how they’re getting the signal, what pitch is coming. I know the Commissioner’s office looked into this and they determined there was nothing to it. Can you assure us that there were no buzzers or anything like that being used?

HINCH: Well the Commissioner – We got investigated for three months. And the Commissioner’s office did as thorough an investigation as anyone could imagine, as possible. I mean I know you mentioned the emails, and the texts, and the messages. And I believe them. 

So in response to Verducci asking whether the Astros’ manipulation of the game had taken the next step and gone even further beyond the pale, Hinch did not issue a denial. He did not say “No, we did not use buzzers.” He said that he believes in the league’s investigation, which found no evidence of wrongdoing in the 2019 season. Hinch did not defend himself and his team as much as he hid behind the nine-page PDF that got sent around.

There have long been rumors floating around that the Astros were using some sort of wearable tech to gain an edge during games. Those flames got stoked when Jose Altuve screamed at his teammates to not rip off his jersey and how he immediately dashed into the clubhouse to do it himself following his walk-off homer to win the ALCS, and when something involving some sort of clear tape fell off of Robinson Chirinos‘ bat during the World Series. Then there was the whole incident with the fake Twitter account attributed to Carlos Beltran’s niece, but was revealed to probably run by a much weirder person. In short, the Internet doesn’t exactly trust the league’s stipulation that the Astros were model citizens in 2019, and they already felt that way before last night’s report from The Wall Street Journal that the Houston front office was in on all of this from the beginning.

Hinch’s answer seems awfully odd for a man who was clearly doing this interview to gain favor back to his side and lay groundwork for another managing job sometime in the future. If the Astros absolutely did not use buzzers, one would imagine that Hinch would say simply say so. Is he trying to insinuate that the players may have done so on their own, without his knowledge? That would be absurd. Managers know what’s going on inside their clubhouses.

Moreover, we now know the league report that Hinch is holding up to defend himself isn’t exactly the most accurate thing in the world. The scheme was not in fact player-driven, and Alex Cora was far from the only non-player to be involved with this mess. Did the Houston front office just simply stop developing new cheating methods after they put Codebreaker into action? What exactly does the “dark arts” reference in that 2019 budget spreadsheet that The Journal learned about mean?

There’s something fishy here. I’m not here to tell you that the Astros 100% used those buzzers or that Pepe and Carol don’t really exist. But that answer from Hinch in an interview that was supposed to be all about how he’s really a standup guy who merely lost his way for a while is… odd, to say the least.

Follow @StelliniTweets

Rumor: MLB execs discussing 100-game season that would begin July 1

David Price and Mookie Betts
Jayne Kamin-Oncea/Getty Images

Matt Spiegel of 670 The Score Chicago heard from a source that Major League Baseball executives have been discussing a 100-game season that would begin on July 1 and conclude on October 15. It would essentially pick up the second half schedule, eliminating the All-Star Game while hosting the World Series at a neutral warm-weather stadium — ideally Dodger Stadium.

In the event the Dodgers, who won 106 games last year, made it all the way through the playoffs, the World Series would be hosted in Anaheim or San Diego. The earlier rounds of the playoffs would be played in the cities of the teams involved, which might be tough since the postseason would extend into November.

Spiegel went on to describe this vision as “an absolute best case scenario,” and that’s accurate. In order for the regular season to begin on July 1, the players would need to have several weeks if not a full month prior to get back into playing shape — more or less an abbreviated second spring training. And that would mean the U.S. having made significant progress against the virus by way of herd immunity or a vaccine, which would allow for nonessential businesses to resume operations. The U.S., sadly, is faring not so well compared to other nations around the world for a variety of reasons, but all of which point to a return to normalcy by the summer seeming rather unlikely.

Regardless, the league does have to plan for the potential of being able to start the regular season this summer just in case things really do break right and offer that opportunity. Commissioner Rob Manfred has stated multiple times about the league’s need to be creative, referring to ideas like playing deep into the fall, changing up the location of games, playing without fans in attendance, etc. This rumor certainly fits the “creative” mold.