Patrick Smith/Getty Images

Nationals dominate Cardinals 8-1 to take 3-0 NLCS lead

12 Comments

The Nationals are one win away from reaching the World Series after defeating the Cardinals 8-1 in NLCS Game 3 to take a commanding 3-0 series lead. Howie Kendrick and Anthony Rendon led the way on offense while Stephen Strasburg dominated on the mound.

Adam Eaton opened the scoring in the bottom of the third inning against Jack Flaherty. Victor Robles led off with a single and advanced to second base on Strasburg’s sacrifice bunt. After Trea Turner struck out on a foul tip, Adam Eaton grounded a ball up the middle to plate Robles. The rally continued as Anthony Rendon dunked a weak fly ball to shallow left field that Marcell Ozuna was unable to handle, allowing a hustling Eaton to score all the way from first base. Juan Soto walked, then he and Rendon advanced on a wild pitch by Flaherty — though it should’ve been a passed ball on catcher Yadier Molina. Howie Kendrick brought both runners home with a sharp line drive double to right-center, upping the lead to 4-0.

Two more runs touched home in the fifth. Rendon hit a one-out single, then Kendrick ripped a double to left-center off of reliever John Brebbia to make it 5-0. Ryan Zimmerman then knocked Kendrick in with a double of his own to left field.

Flaherty ended the night allowing four runs on five hits and a pair of walks with six strikeouts over four innings.

Robles, making his first start since injuring his hamstring in Game 2 of the NLDS, swatted a solo homer to the opposite field off of Brebbia in the sixth for good measure, putting the Nationals up by a touchdown and an extra point.

The Cardinals, held scoreless in Game 1 and to one run in Game 2, weren’t able to figure out Strasburg until the seventh inning. José Martínez and Yadier Molina hit back-to-back singles to open the frame. Then, with one out, Paul DeJong lined a single to left field. Soto came up ready to fire home, which likely would have kept Martínez at third base and the bases loaded. However, Soto slipped and fell during his crow hop, then fired a throw home way wide of the plate. Martínez scored the Cardinals’ first run of the game. Strasburg bounced back with consecutive strikeouts of Matt Wieters and Dexter Fowler to escape the seventh.

Strasbug allowed the one unearned run on seven hits with no walks and 12 strikeouts over his seven innings of work. An interesting note, per MLB’s Daren Willman: none of Strasburg’s strikeouts came on his fastball. Eight were on the change-up and four on the curve.

After Strasburg’s night was done, the Nationals continued to rally. Another Howie Kendrick double — his third of the night — and a Zimmerman single to left field off of Daniel Ponce de Leon made it 8-1.

Fernando Rodney took over in the eighth with a comfortable seven-run cushion. He got Kolten Wong to fly out, then struck out Paul Goldschmidt and Ozuna for a 1-2-3 inning. That was Goldschmidt’s fourth strikeout of the night. He hadn’t even struck out three times in 15 postseason games prior to Monday. He wore the golden sombrero just eight times in 1,253 career regular season games.

Tanner Rainey got the ninth inning. The right-hander struck out Martínez and Molina, then got Tommy Edman to fly out to left field to end the game. Nats win 8-1, got up 3-0 in the NLCS.

The Nationals will try to punch their ticket to the World Series on Tuesday night in Game 4 of the NLCS. Patrick Corbin will take on Dakota Hudson. First pitch is slated for 8:05 PM at Nationals Park.

Rob Manfred explains reasoning behind proposal to cut 42 minor league teams

Cody Glenn/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
6 Comments

As we learned earlier this week, Major League Baseball wants to contract 42 minor league teams, mostly in short-season and rookie ball. The proposal earned a lot of backlash, including from some of the teams on the chopping block and from Congress. MLB responded with its own letter to Congress, written by deputy commissioner Dan Halem, explaining the league’s reasoning.

In the letter, Halem complains about the lack of competition between minor league teams and independent teams. Halem wrote, “The lack of competition among operators of teams for an affiliation with a Major League Club has reduced the incentive for some affiliated Minor League teams to improve their facilities and player amenities.” It is an interesting thing to write as someone representing a $10 billion business that has benefited for a century from an antitrust exemption.

Halem also noted that MLB has several goals that are supposedly attained by cutting 26 percent of the minors: ensuring the quality of the facilities for the players, reducing the travel burden, improving the “compensation, accommodations, and amenities” for players, improving the affiliation process between minor league and major league teams.

Commissioner Rob Manfred essentially echoed that sentiment on Thursday, per Newsday’s Laura Albanese. He gave four reasons behind the proposal: inadequate facilities, travel, poor pay, drafting and signing players who don’t have a realistic shot to make it to the majors. The last reason is a new one, but let’s go over those four reasons in context.

It is true that some, perhaps even most, of the facilities of the 42 named teams are inadequate. It’s not all of them. As NECN’s Jack Thurston reports, the owner of the short-season Lowell Spinners, Dave Heller, said that his team’s stadium is “arguably the best facility in the New York-Penn League,” speaking highly of its lighting and field conditions. The Quad Cities River Bandits, the Astros’ Single-A affiliate and also on the chopping block, renovated their stadium a handful of times over the last 12 years. In fact, it earned an award from BallparkDigest.com for “Best Ballpark Improvement” in both 2008 and ’09, and finished third in the 2018 running for “Best View in the Minors.” At any rate, if facility quality is such a big issue, why did the Athletics continue to play in a stadium that repeatedly had its sewage system overflow in 2013?

Travel is certainly a big issue for minor leaguers because they mostly travel by bus, not plane. Having teams located closer to each other would be more beneficial in this regard. Or — and hear me out, here — major league teams could take on the extra expenditure of paying for their minor leaguers’ airfare. Several years ago, the Phillies took on the extra expenditure of making sure their minor leaguers ate healthy food and that has worked out well. The Blue Jays took on the extra expenditure of giving their minor leaguers a pay raise and that has worked out well. The Red Sox took on the extra expenditure of installing a sleep room at Fenway Park to ensure their players were well-rested and that has worked out well. No one is suggesting that Single-A players have to fly first class on every flight, but the travel issue is an easy fix that doesn’t require contracting 42 teams. Teams have individually chosen to improve their players’ quality of life and it has yielded positive results. Imagine it on a league-wide scale for thousands of players in their formative years.

Manfred citing minor league pay as a basis for the proposal is laughable. His own league successfully lobbied Congress to amend language in the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, classifying minor league players as seasonal workers. That means they are not entitled to a minimum wage or overtime pay, among other worker protections. If the pay of minor league players was so important to Major League Baseball, it wouldn’t have pressured the government to legally ensure they didn’t have to pay them a living wage. Every baseball team is worth at least a billion dollars. The league has set year-over-year revenue records for 16 consecutive years, crossing $10 billion in 2018. Minor leaguers could be compensated well without robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Lastly, it is true that a majority of minor league players will never reach the major leagues. That doesn’t mean that their presence in the minor leagues or their effort to realize their dreams have zero value. Lopping off the bottom 26 percent of minor leaguers might nominally increase the level of skill on each roster, but it eliminates so many jobs — well over 1,000. Furthermore, there are few incentives for athletes to want to slog through several years of the minors as it is, as Kyler Murray recently showed, but there would be even fewer incentives by shrinking the minors (and, consequently, the draft). Shrinking the minors and the draft could lead to more minor league free agents, but if baseball is actually interested in a free market (it’s not) then it should abolish the draft entirely as well as the arbitration system.

These reasons, each uniquely fallacious, hide the real reason behind the proposal: shifting money around so Major League Baseball can say it will award pay raises to minor leaguers, ending a years-long stretch of bad P.R., without actually cutting into profits. MLB could have afforded to pay minor leaguers a living wage years ago and it chose not to. MLB could have chosen not to lobby Congress for the ability to continue underpaying minor leaguers years ago, but it chose to do so. Everything since has been the league trying to avoid lying in the bed it made for itself.