Getty Images

Another child injured by foul ball

49 Comments

It seems like this happens every week: a young child was struck and injured by a line drive foul ball in yesterday’s game between the Royals and Indians at Progressive Field in Cleveland.

The child, who is three-years-old, was struck by a hard foul ball off the bat of Indians shortstop Francisco Lindor. The child was transported to a local hospital. The Indians are not authorized to release any information about the child, but Lindor said after the game he was told that the child was in stable condition.

The protective netting at Progressive Field runs to the end of each dugout. Lindor’s line drive landed several sections beyond the netting and was about 12 to 15 rows into the stands. Lindor said after the game that he thinks that all teams should extend protective netting from foul pole to foul pole:

“I encourage every MLB team to put the nets all the way down. I know it’s all about the fans’ experience of interacting with players and I completely get that. You want to have that interaction with the fans, getting autographs and stuff, but at the end of the day, we want to make sure everybody comes out of this game healthy, and we got to do something about it. Everybody feels bad. And if we can put the nets a little bit further down, I think it would be a lot better.”

The Chicago White Sox, Washington Nationals and Kansas City Royals have either extended protective netting or recently announced plans to do so. In both Chicago and Kansas City this was done in direct response to a child getting injured. This reactive, rather than proactive, response is similar to all 30 teams extending netting to the end of dugouts only after a child was seriously injured at a Yankees game at the end of the 2017 season. This despite the fact that Major League Baseball recommended, but did not mandate, extended netting nearly two years earlier, in December 2015.

Why teams have consistently refused to extend netting unless or until children get injured is an interesting question. It’s one that, if I was an attorney for the family of an injured child, I’d be asking team and league officials — officials who have spent the past several years using ever-increasing exit velocities of balls off bats as a marketing tool and who have acknowledged that the ball has experienced changes recently which has caused it to fly farther, faster — in a formal setting.

Nationals’ major leaguers to continue offering financial assistance to minor leaguers

Sean Doolittle
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
1 Comment

On Sunday, we learned that while the Nationals would continue to pay their minor leaguers throughout the month of June, their weekly stipend would be lowered by 25 percent, from $400 to $300. In an incredible act of solidarity, Nationals reliever Sean Doolittle and his teammates put out a statement, saying they would be covering the missing $100 from the stipends.

After receiving some criticism, the Nationals reversed course, agreeing to pay their minor leaguers their full $400 weekly stipend.

Doolittle and co. have not withdrawn their generosity. On Wednesday, Doolittle released another statement, saying that he and his major league teammates would continue to offer financial assistance to Nationals minor leaguers through the non-profit organization More Than Baseball.

The full statement:

Washington Nationals players were excited to learn that our minor leaguers will continue receiving their full stipends. We are grateful that efforts have been made to restore their pay during these challenging times.

We remain committed to supporting them. Nationals players are partnering with More Than Baseball to contribute funds that will offer further assistance and financial support to any minor leaguers who were in the Nationals organization as of March 1.

We’ll continue to stand with them as we look forward to resuming our 2020 MLB season.

Kudos to Doolittle and the other Nationals continuing to offer a helping hand in a trying time. The players shouldn’t have to subsidize their employers’ labor expenses, but that is the world we live in today.