Getty Images

It’s time to talk about bringing Major League Baseball to Las Vegas again


LAS VEGAS — I arrived in Las Vegas for the Winter Meetings late yesterday afternoon and got into a cab. The cabbie asked me what brought me to town and I told him.

“Baseball! So, are we getting a big league team or what?” he said.

“Um, not that I know of,” I said, not having heard any MLB-to-Vegas talk for several years. Still, I was about to go into my usual spiel about why I don’t think Las Vegas is a good fit for Major League Baseball, when he cut me off.

“But the commissioner guy said we’re getting a team.”

Hmm. I had been in a media blackout for most of the day so I suppose anything was possible, but that didn’t sound right. I learned a long time ago, though, not to argue with a cabbie about anything other than my destination or my fare because doing so can make it way less pleasant getting to my destination and could seriously impact my fare. I let it go and vowed to Google it later.

I did. And this is what I got. From the Las Vegas Review-Journal:

Six years ago, while giving a deposition in a New Jersey sports betting case, then-Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig spoke steadfastly against ever placing a franchise in Las Vegas and railed against gambling as “evil.” Today, a group is working with investors to build a stadium and bring a major-league team to Las Vegas.

Those efforts come as Selig’s successor, Rob Manfred, calls Las Vegas a viable market for the sport and baseball’s decision-makers descend on the city for the league’s Winter Meetings at Mandalay Bay from Dec. 9-13.

The investors include Lou Weisbach, who tried to lure the Montreal Expos to Las Vegas back in the early 2000s and former pitcher and broadcaster Steve Stone. They envision a state-of-the-art retractable roof stadium — built with no public funds — that’ll cost over a billion bucks. They also think it can and should be built before Major League Baseball either awards and expansion team or allows another team to relocate. Weisbach thinks that’s why Washington D.C. got the Expos rather than Las Vegas: RFK Stadium was already there, ready to accept the team.

Historically baseball has not taken Las Vegas particularly seriously as a potential team location, so, what are we to make of all of this? Why do these guys think Sin City is ripe for baseball now when it never really has been considered so before? What has changed?

One thing that has certainly changed is MLB’s attitude about gambling. As the Review-Journal story notes, Bud Selig and the powers that be were scared to death of gambling even a few short years ago. Now, as we noted a couple of weeks ago, MLB is now in business with one of the largest gaming companies on the planet, MGM, naming it its “Official Gaming Partner.” And, of course, the Winter Meetings are back here in Las Vegas for the first time in a decade. Bud might’ve thought it wicked, but gambling doesn’t scare the current set of suits on Park Avenue at all.

Another thing that has changed, of course, is that right next to 1-15, just west of The Strip, the superstructure of the soon-to-be Las Vegas Raiders stadium is becoming visible, being constructed at a breakneck pace in order to be done for them by the fall of 2020. Major League Baseball might not care about the Raiders, but it no doubt loved to see a city give a football team nearly a billion dollars in incentives to relocate here. While Weisbach and Stone might want to build a ballpark without public money, I’m guessing Major League Baseball understands quite clearly (a) how negotiable that sort of thing tends to be; and (b) how, even with a mostly privately-funded park, there are all kinds of goodies that come with a new building.

A third thing that has changed is the instant success of the Las Vegas Golden Knights, who made the Stanley Cup Finals in their first year of existence. Again, Rob Manfred likely doesn’t care how the team did on the ice, but one of the biggest challenges baseball in Las Vegas would face would be attendance. Sure, you can sell out a football stadium eight times a year, especially given that the games are on weekends. But will people show up for 81 baseball games, many which take place on Tuesday and Wednesdays? The hockey season has half as many games as the baseball season, but the Golden Knights sold out basically every game 41 times, and that’s a positive sign.

So, that’s what has changed. Is it enough? Does it matter? Would Las Vegas be a viable city for a big league team?

My past skepticism on baseball in Las Vegas mostly surrounded the gambling thing and attendance. I was less focused on baseball’s hatred of gambling, though, than I was on casinos’ displeasure with an entertainment option that would take potential gamblers off the casino floor for three or four hours a night, 81 nights a year. With a major casino company partnering with baseball, however, that displeasure would be decreased. And, of course, it’s not 1955 anymore. There are all kinds of entertainment options here with which the casinos have figured out how to play nice and, more often, partner-up. The rodeo is in town right now and Mandalay Bay looks like Fort Worth or something. Cowboys as far as the eye can see, buying expensive boots at trade shows, drinking ridiculous drinks and spending all kinds of money when they’re not watching the horses and cows over at the Thomas and Mack Center. Casinos know how to make a buck off of ancillary crap here. Probably better than anyone.

I do worry a bit more about support of the team, though. Sure, maybe they can get some nice attendance at this park they’re going to allegedly build, but as we all know, attendance is not the only driver — and probably not even the most important driver — of a baseball’s team’s financial health these days. That would be TV money, and that’s based mostly on the sheer number of cable subscribers who will be paying for the Las Vegas [To Be Determineds] games in their rec rooms.

Vegas may be a place with a lot of money and a lot of hotel guests in town at any given time, but it’s not a place with a lot of permanent residents (i.e. people who subscribe to cable packages) by big league sports standards. It’s the 28th-largest MSA, just behind Sacramento. MLB markets smaller than Las Vegas: Cincinnati, Kansas City, Cleveland and Milwaukee. The Brewers are the team for an entire state, though, so city size is a bit misleading there. Those other three teams have history and tradition going for them which helps, and they’re obviously not going anywhere, but even so, they’re not exactly considered the paragons of modern healthy baseball markets. Due to both modest TV deals and attendance fluctuations they have the sorts of financial challenges that, if MLB were to start from scratch, might cause them to be passed over. Could a Las Vegas team — one that does not have the history and built-in, generational fan base of the Indians, Reds and Royals — get a fat TV deal that’d keep them from being a poor sister right out of the gate? I don’t know, but I don’t think it’s obvious that it could.

So no, it’s not a gimme that baseball would work here. Still, as everyone who is anyone in the business of baseball makes there way to Las Vegas for this week’s festivities, asking “will Major League Baseball come to Las Vegas?” is a very different question than it was even a few years ago. One that, I suspect, will be asked more and more.

Report: Some MLB teams using outside labs for COVID-19 testing

MLB COVID-19 testing
Jason Koerner/Getty Images
Leave a comment

The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal and Zach Buchanan report that the Diamondbacks are one of several teams that have used labs other than the Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory in Utah to process COVID-19 testing. MLB has encountered delays with its testing, despite promising 24-hour turnaround time, so teams have tried other avenues — with the league’s endorsement — in order to get faster results.

The SMRTL had processed performance-enhancing drug screenings for MLB. The league converted it to process COVID-19 tests amid concerns that having a season and all of the testing that would be required throughout would take away testing resources from the general public. That some teams are utilizing labs other than the SMRTL suggests the league, indeed, is usurping those resources.

In prospect Seth Beer’s case, he tested positive for COVID-19. He needed to test negative twice consecutively to be cleared to return to play. Beer went to a third-party site in the Phoenix area. He received his second negative test and was cleared to return on July 9.

The Diamondbacks said that the labs they have used have assured them that they are not taking away tests from the public. That seems like a claim MLB and the D-Backs should demonstrably prove. Per Rosenthal and Buchahan, the D-Backs have gone to an outside lab about 20 times, which accounts for less than one percent of COVID-19 tests taken by players and staff. Still, those are 20 tests that could have been used by the general public. And if the D-Backs and a handful of other teams already are using outside labs, then the rest of the league likely already is or soon will be doing the same. In the end, there will be a lot more than 20 tests taken at outside labs by MLB players and staff. Considering that “Tier 1” players will be tested every other day throughout the season, the total of third-party tests taken — if things continue the way they are now — could easily reach into the thousands by the end of October.

We all want baseball back, but the players, coaches, and all other staff are no more important than cashiers, teachers, and delivery drivers, so they shouldn’t have more access to COVID-19 testing simply by virtue of being associated with Major League Baseball and all of its influence and financial muscle. It would be unethical for MLB to be cutting in line ahead of other people who need testing just as much as if not more than the players.