Jeff Zelevansky/Getty Images

Ruben Amaro, Jr. is now an advisor to new Mets GM Brodie Van Wagenen


The Mets made a handful of coaching changes on Monday. Gary DiSarcina is now the third base coach. Glenn Sherlock is now the first base coach. Pitching coach Dave Eiland and assistant hitting coach Tom Slater were retained. Bullpen coach Ricky Bones will be reassigned within the organization. Hitting coach Pat Roessler was not retained. Also, notably, former first base coach Ruben Amaro, Jr. has been named the new advisor to new GM Brodie Van Wagenen.

According to Tim Britton of The Athletic, Amaro let the Mets know about his interest in their open GM position and other potential front office positions near the end of the 2018 season. Ultimately, the Mets decided to go with the now-former agent with zero experience. As Newsday’s Tim Healey points out, Van Wagenen is surrounded by plenty of people who do have experience. Along with Amaro, he has Omar Minaya and J.P. Ricciardi, both former GMs, as well as John Ricco who has been the Mets’ assistant GM since 2006.

Amaro’s career path has been interesting, to say the least. The son of a former major leaguer, Amaro Jr. spent parts of eight seasons in the majors with the Angels, Indians, and Phillies. He joined the Phillies’ front office upon retiring under then-GM Ed Wade and continued to work under Pat Gillick, who took over after Wade. When Gillick stepped aside following the Phillies’ championship in 2008, Amaro was named the new GM. The Phillies fired him late in the 2015 season. Amaro took a job as the first base coach for the Red Sox in 2016, then took the same job with the Mets in 2017. Now he’s back in the front office.

Amaro has also dabbled in acting, having multiple cameos on ABC’s show The Goldbergs:

Amaro is anything but typical.

Hall of Fame should do away with cap logos on plaques

Jim McIsaac/Getty Images

As mentioned earlier, Brandy Halladay, wife of the late pitcher Roy Halladay, says he will not wear a cap with the logo of either of the two teams he played for during his 16-year career. Instead, he will wear a generic baseball cap. Brandy said, “He was a Major League Baseball player and that’s how we want him to be remembered.”

In the time since this news was reported, Blue Jays and Phillies fans have been arguing with each other and the takes are flying. Take, for example, this article by Bob Ford on It’s titled, “Roy Halladay would have wanted his Hall of Fame plaque to have a Phillies hat.” In August 2016, Halladay was asked which team’s cap he would prefer to wear if he got into Cooperstown. Halladay said, “I’d go as a Blue Jay.” He continued, “I wanted to retire here, too, just because I felt like this is the bulk of my career.”

Brandy hasn’t said why her family has decided to have her late husband wear neither team’s logo on the cap in his plaque, but the territoriality displayed by each city’s fans might be part of the reasoning. Ultimately, I believe she made the right call and it shows why the Hall of Fame should do away with logos on plaques entirely.

The National Baseball Hall of Fame was established in 1936, a time when players spent an overwhelming majority of their careers — if not their entire careers — with one team. Take, for example, the class of five inducted in the Hall’s inaugural year: Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth, Honus Wagner, Christy Mathewson, and Walter Johnson. Cobb played for the Tigers for 22 of his 24 seasons. Wagner spent 18 of his 21 seasons with the Pirates. Mathewson pitched for the Giants in 16 and a half of his 17 seasons. Johnson spent all 21 years with the Senators. Ruth was famously sold by the Red Sox to the Yankees and he still spent 15 of his 22 seasons in New York. There were rarely debates about which cap a Hall of Famer should wear in his plaque.

It is increasingly rare for a player nowadays to stick with one team for most or all of his career due to the advent of free agency and the frequency of trades. Hall of Fame candidate Curt Schilling, for example, pitched for five teams and the team he spent the most time with — the Phillies — is arguably No. 3 on the list of cap priorities behind the Red Sox and Diamondbacks. Fellow Hall candidate Manny Ramírez spent equal time with the Indians and Red Sox and also had three really good seasons with the Dodgers. Whenever a player who spent significant time with multiple teams is inducted into the Hall of Fame, the “which cap will he wear?” conversation comes up and inevitably pits fans of one team against the others. That’s not what the Hall of Fame should be about; it should be about celebrating the storied careers and the types of men these players are or were, no matter which team or how many teams he pitched for.

When you get to the core of it, the logo on the cap is just an advertisement, anyway. The Phillies and Blue Jays are businesses. Our human nature as fans — our territoriality, our loyalty, our sense of belonging — causes us to want to claim the superiority of one business and its associated laundry over another. Most of the time, this doesn’t seem out of place, but Halladay is a unique case as he made significant contributions to two franchises and was voted in posthumously, so he can’t speak for himself (he did in 2016, as mentioned). Brandy shouldn’t have to worry about upsetting one fan base or another picking a logo for her late husband, and she shouldn’t have to be second-guessed by fans who feel spurned. The Hall of Fame should follow Brandy’s lead and, going forward, induct all of its players without cap logos on their plaques.