Getty Images

Hero Max Muncy gives the Dodgers hope, at least for one day

11 Comments

Until about a quarter to 11 last night, the story of Game 3 was Walker Buehler. The rookie starting pitcher who, in an age of extreme bullpen specialization and expectations that starters need only give their team four or five good innings in the postseason, spun masterful, shutout ball through seven. He allowed only two hits in that time and didn’t walk a batter, ended things with an exclamation point of a strikeout of J.D. Martinez and left with a 1-0 lead.

Buehler’s was an old school, throwback pitching performance. A big boy start that seemed poised to give the Dodgers Game 3 and a chance for a good night’s sleep after it.

Then, suddenly, a game that may have taken place in 2012 or 1985 or 1972 snapped back into 2018. And then it almost lasted into 2019. In the end — seven hours and twenty minutes after it started —  the Dodgers got their win, and by the time it was over it was hard to even remember Buehler’s heroics from its first half. Partially because of how long it took to get there, partially because a greater hero emerged.

The point of divergence between Buehler’s throwback baseball and baseball of 2018 was Jackie Bradley Jr.’s solo homer in the eighth off of Kenley Jansen. It would be the last solidly hit ball for the next four hours. We’ll get to the next hard hit ball in a second, but for a moment, let’s talk about what came in between.

Innings nine through 18 were, let’s be honest, a death march of strikeouts and pop-ups, weak contact and missed opportunities. Game 3 will go down in history due to its length and dramatic ending, but it’s not one — its beginning and its ending aside — that was specifically memorable. In some ways those long in-between innings were a microcosm of baseball in 2018, with their high heat, many strikeouts and a lack of baserunners and action. As anyone who stayed up and watched the whole thing can attest, it was kinda hard to watch for long stretches.

But it was not without its drama. Lost in the postgame celebration was the gutsy performance of Nathan Eovaldi. Like Dante in “Clerks,” he wasn’t even supposed to be here today, yet there he was, taking the mound in the 13th inning and keeping the Sox in it through 97 pitches he had no business throwing. Ninety-seven hard pitches, starting out at triple digits and staying in the high-90s through the end of the game. The one run he gave up in the 13th was not earned and not at all his fault and the one run he gave up in the 18th, well, at some point someone had to break, right? It’s sad that it had to be Eovaldi, really. The guy earned a place in Red Sox history with that outing, even if it ended badly.

But there was, quite obviously, another hero on this night and his name was Max Muncy.

Muncy almost ended it in the 15th with a long drive that just hooked foul before Eovaldi eventually struck him out. In the bottom of the 18th, though, he came through. It wasn’t easy. After falling behind 3-0, Eovaldi fought back, getting a get-me-over fastball for a strike and then having Muncy foul off two pitches. By then everyone was exhausted, but it’s hard to imagine anyone was more exhausted than Eovaldi. His pitch — a cutter which didn’t really cut, but which still managed to register at 90 m.p.h. — was accompanied by a grunt. And was followed by a drive:

 

Muncy’s homer would be historic regardless, coming as it did at the end of the longest game in World Series history. But it has the chance to be one of the most historic home runs in Dodgers history. The gold standard is, obviously, Kirk Gibson’s shot in Game 1 of the 1988 World Series. That gave the Dodgers the game and set the stage for them to beat the heavily favored Oakland A’s.

Muncy’s however, could prove to be bigger if the Dodgers can continue to fight off the Red Sox, climb out of heir now 2-1 hole and win this thing. It’ll be seen as the home run that turned what seemed to be an un-turnable tide. A homer that rallied the Dodgers when they were dangerously close to falling behind 0-3 and stretched to their absolute limit in the longest game in which any of their players had ever participated. Muncy’s homer — coming at the end of his improbable breakout season — could prove to be the most improbable spark.

But even if it doesn’t — even if Boston rights the ship after their Game 3 loss and wins two of the final four games and takes the Series — Muncy and the Dodgers and their fans had this moment. This incredible, walkoff homer in the wee small hours that, for now, has given them new life.

Astros defend barring reporter from clubhouse

Getty Images
11 Comments

As we wrote about this morning, last night the Houston Astros, at the request of Justin Verlander, barred Detroit Free Press reporter Anthony Fenech from the clubhouse during Verlander’s media availability following the Tigers-Astros game. After Verlander was done talking to the press in the scrum setting — and after a call was placed to Major League Baseball about the matter — Fenech was allowed in.

As we noted, this was done in violation of agreements to which Major League Baseball, the Houston Astros and the Baseball Writers Association of America are parties. The agreements are meant to ensure full access to BBWAA-accredited reporters as long as they have not violated the terms of their credentials.  In no case do the clubs — and certainly not the players — have the right to bar access to BBWAA-accredited reporters. Indeed, the whole point of the BBWAA is to ensure such access and to ensure that teams cannot bar them simply because they are unhappy with their coverage or what have you.

This morning Verlander tweeted, obliquely, about “unethical behavior” on the part of Fenech that led to his request to the Astros to bar him. As we noted at the time, such an allegation — however interesting it might be — is of no consequence to the admission or barring of a reporter. If Fenech has acted unethically it’s a matter between him and his employer and, potentially, between him and the BBWAA. At the very least, if Verlander has a specific concern, it would be incumbent upon him or the Astros to take the matter up with either the Free Press or the BBWAA.

In light of all of this, it’s hard to make a case for Verlander’s request and the Astros’ honoring it. A few moments ago, however, the Astros released as statement on the matter which, basically, says, “so what?”

Which is to say, the Astros have made a decades-long agreement between the BBWAA and MLB regarding reporter access optional, because a player does not like a reporter who is covering him.  Someone without the power to alter the BBWAA-MLB relationship has just done so unilaterally. And they have done so in such a way that any player, should they decide they don’t like a reporter, will now presumably rely on it as precedent. Finally, it should be noted that in issuing this statement, the Astros have given at least some tacit credence to Verlander’s thus far unsubstantiated and unspecified allegations of unethical behavior on the part of Fenech, which seems less-than-ideal at best.

It’s your move, Major League Baseball and BBWAA. Whatcha gonna do about it?