Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images

Must-Read: Victor Rojas on diversity in the broadcast booth

25 Comments

Over the years, we’ve written on various issues involving diversity in baseball, whether it’s on the field, on the coaching staffs, in the front office, or in the broadcast booth. To Major League Baseball’s credit, it has made very material efforts towards changing that for the better. As it pertains to on-air talent, however, baseball broadcast booths remain largely white and male.

Angels TV broadcaster Victor Rojas, whose father Cookie is a former major leaguer and from Cuba, wrote a must-read blog about the subject of diversity in baseball broadcasting. Rojas notes that there are only a handful of minorities doing play-by-play, whether on radio or on TV, listing himself along with Joe Angel (Orioles radio), Robert Ford (Astros radio), Buck Martinez (Blue Jays TV), and Dave Sims (Mariners TV).

Rojas goes on to write, “I can see where a young minority fan sitting at home with thoughts of one day becoming the next Jaime Jarrín or Felo Ramírez on English language broadcasts could be discouraged because of the lack of minorities staring back at them through the television.”

In my own discussions with other white people about this, particularly those of a conservative political bent, making workplaces more diverse doesn’t strike them as a moral imperative. Diversity, at the very least, should strike everybody from an economic standpoint. The young minority fan Rojas spoke of is not likely to become a lifelong, money-spending fan of Major League Baseball if he can’t get emotionally invested in the sport, which is helped by being able to identify with its participants — the players, the coaches, the broadcasters. They will go where they are represented: in other traditional sports, in esports, and in other forms of media.

According to SportsBusiness Journal, a recent study of Nielsen TV viewership data found that Major League Baseball’s audience is the oldest among the four major sports with an average age of 57 years. 83 perecent of those who watch baseball on TV are white. The NFL’s average viewer is 50 followed by hockey (49) and basketball (42). The Atlantic found several years ago that MLB’s audience is the most male-dominant at 70 percent. We know, generally, who’s watching baseball (older white men) and we know who’s not watching baseball (everybody else). While Major League Baseball is quite healthy right now, setting revenue records year after year, it needs diversity up and down the ranks in order to continue having a bright future. Eventually those older white men will die. Their eyeballs and their money will need to be replaced.

Rojas says, “There are endless numbers of ways to be a part of our business and I think we’re failing in showing what those possibilities may be. If we can somehow create a larger pool of talented individuals who want to pursue a career in our industry, then we’ll have that many more for the front offices of teams and television networks to consider when it comes time to hiring.”

Humans are, by nature, very tribal. This is why we’ve had to make repeated, concerted efforts to force our society to diversify. White people are more likely to befriend white people. When white people attain positions of power, they are likely to fill other positions of power with their friends, who are very likely to be white. Replace “white” with other demographics with which we create hierarchies, such as gender, and it remains just as true. If we diversify baseball, even starting at the ground floor, the diversity will eventually make its way up the ladder. We should strive for quicker, greater change, but progress in the U.S. has typically come in bite-sized chunks.

Rob Manfred explains reasoning behind proposal to cut 42 minor league teams

Cody Glenn/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
7 Comments

As we learned earlier this week, Major League Baseball wants to contract 42 minor league teams, mostly in short-season and rookie ball. The proposal earned a lot of backlash, including from some of the teams on the chopping block and from Congress. MLB responded with its own letter to Congress, written by deputy commissioner Dan Halem, explaining the league’s reasoning.

In the letter, Halem complains about the lack of competition between minor league teams and independent teams. Halem wrote, “The lack of competition among operators of teams for an affiliation with a Major League Club has reduced the incentive for some affiliated Minor League teams to improve their facilities and player amenities.” It is an interesting thing to write as someone representing a $10 billion business that has benefited for a century from an antitrust exemption.

Halem also noted that MLB has several goals that are supposedly attained by cutting 26 percent of the minors: ensuring the quality of the facilities for the players, reducing the travel burden, improving the “compensation, accommodations, and amenities” for players, improving the affiliation process between minor league and major league teams.

Commissioner Rob Manfred essentially echoed that sentiment on Thursday, per Newsday’s Laura Albanese. He gave four reasons behind the proposal: inadequate facilities, travel, poor pay, drafting and signing players who don’t have a realistic shot to make it to the majors. The last reason is a new one, but let’s go over those four reasons in context.

It is true that some, perhaps even most, of the facilities of the 42 named teams are inadequate. It’s not all of them. As NECN’s Jack Thurston reports, the owner of the short-season Lowell Spinners, Dave Heller, said that his team’s stadium is “arguably the best facility in the New York-Penn League,” speaking highly of its lighting and field conditions. The Quad Cities River Bandits, the Astros’ Single-A affiliate and also on the chopping block, renovated their stadium a handful of times over the last 12 years. In fact, it earned an award from BallparkDigest.com for “Best Ballpark Improvement” in both 2008 and ’09, and finished third in the 2018 running for “Best View in the Minors.” At any rate, if facility quality is such a big issue, why did the Athletics continue to play in a stadium that repeatedly had its sewage system overflow in 2013?

Travel is certainly a big issue for minor leaguers because they mostly travel by bus, not plane. Having teams located closer to each other would be more beneficial in this regard. Or — and hear me out, here — major league teams could take on the extra expenditure of paying for their minor leaguers’ airfare. Several years ago, the Phillies took on the extra expenditure of making sure their minor leaguers ate healthy food and that has worked out well. The Blue Jays took on the extra expenditure of giving their minor leaguers a pay raise and that has worked out well. The Red Sox took on the extra expenditure of installing a sleep room at Fenway Park to ensure their players were well-rested and that has worked out well. No one is suggesting that Single-A players have to fly first class on every flight, but the travel issue is an easy fix that doesn’t require contracting 42 teams. Teams have individually chosen to improve their players’ quality of life and it has yielded positive results. Imagine it on a league-wide scale for thousands of players in their formative years.

Manfred citing minor league pay as a basis for the proposal is laughable. His own league successfully lobbied Congress to amend language in the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, classifying minor league players as seasonal workers. That means they are not entitled to a minimum wage or overtime pay, among other worker protections. If the pay of minor league players was so important to Major League Baseball, it wouldn’t have pressured the government to legally ensure they didn’t have to pay them a living wage. Every baseball team is worth at least a billion dollars. The league has set year-over-year revenue records for 16 consecutive years, crossing $10 billion in 2018. Minor leaguers could be compensated well without robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Lastly, it is true that a majority of minor league players will never reach the major leagues. That doesn’t mean that their presence in the minor leagues or their effort to realize their dreams have zero value. Lopping off the bottom 26 percent of minor leaguers might nominally increase the level of skill on each roster, but it eliminates so many jobs — well over 1,000. Furthermore, there are few incentives for athletes to want to slog through several years of the minors as it is, as Kyler Murray recently showed, but there would be even fewer incentives by shrinking the minors (and, consequently, the draft). Shrinking the minors and the draft could lead to more minor league free agents, but if baseball is actually interested in a free market (it’s not) then it should abolish the draft entirely as well as the arbitration system.

These reasons, each uniquely fallacious, hide the real reason behind the proposal: shifting money around so Major League Baseball can say it will award pay raises to minor leaguers, ending a years-long stretch of bad P.R., without actually cutting into profits. MLB could have afforded to pay minor leaguers a living wage years ago and it chose not to. MLB could have chosen not to lobby Congress for the ability to continue underpaying minor leaguers years ago, but it chose to do so. Everything since has been the league trying to avoid lying in the bed it made for itself.