Joel Auerbach/Getty Images

Report: Seth Romero violated Nationals team policy, sent home from spring training


Jeff Passan of Yahoo Sports reports that Nationals pitching prospect Seth Romero was sent home from spring training on Monday morning. A spokesman for the Nationals said Romero violated a club policy. Passan adds that it’s not known how long Romero will be gone or which policy he violated.

The Nationals selected Romero in the first round — 25th overall — in last year’s draft. He fell in the first round due to character issues he had while playing for the University of Houston. In 2015, he was suspended indefinitely for “conduct detrimental to the team” which was believed to be poor physical conditioning. He was suspended again in April 2017 for failing a drug test, missing curfew, and being photographed in a team uniform while holding a bong. Romero was reinstated and then dismissed due to getting into a fight with a teammate.

Last season, pitching mostly for low-A Auburn, Romero yielded 12 runs on 19 hits and six walks with 32 strikeouts in 22 innings. MLB Pipeline ranks him as the fifth-best prospect in the Nationals’ system.

Tony Clark: Universal DH ‘gaining momentum’ among players


Major League Baseball Players Association executive director Tony Clark met the press late this morning and covered a wide array of topics.

One of them: free agency, which he referred to as being “under attack” based on the slow market for free agents last offseason.

“What the players saw last offseason was that their free-agent rights were under attack on what has been the bedrock of our system,” Clark said. He added that they “have some very difficult decisions to make.” Presumably in the form of grievances and, down the road, a negotiating strategy that seeks to claw back some of the many concessions the union has given owners in the past few Collective Bargaining Agreements. CBAs, it’s worth noting, that Clark negotiated. We’ve covered that territory in detail in the past.

Of more immediate interest was Clark’s comment that the idea of a universal designated hitter is, among players, “gaining momentum.” Clark says “players are talking about it more than they have in the past.” We’ve talked a lot about that as well.

Given that hating or loving the DH is the closest thing baseball has to a religion, no one’s mind is going to be changed by any of this, but I think, practically speaking, it’s inevitable that the National League will have the DH and I think it happens relatively soon. Perhaps in the next five years. The opposition to it at this point is solely subjective and based on tradition. People like pitchers batting and they like double switches and they like the leagues being different because they, well, like it. If the system were being set up today, however, they’d never have it this way and I think even the DH-haters know that well. That doesn’t mean that you can’t dislike a universal DH, but it does mean that you can’t expect the people who run the game to cater to that preference when it makes little sense for them to do it for their own purposes.

Anyway, enjoy convincing each other in the comments about how the side of that argument you dislike is wrong.