ESPN’s Jayson Stark reports that the Nationals are still interested in free agent catcher Matt Wieters, but adds that it’s doubtful they’d commit to him beyond one year.
Wieters, 30, finished last season hitting .243/.302/.409 with 17 home runs and 66 RBI in 464 plate appearances. He’s the top free agent catcher remaining.
The Nationals currently have Derek Norris and Jose Lobaton as well as Pedro Severino behind the dish, so the team isn’t under any pressure to add a catcher. The Rays have also been listed as an interested team and adding Wieters would allow them to bring Wilson Ramos back from his injury at a reasonable pace rather than rushing him back. The Astros were floated as a potential destination last month, but that seems unlikely given their current catching corps of Brian McCann and Evan Gattis.
Even Drellich of The Athletic reports that the Boston Red Sox are cutting the pay of team employees. Those cuts, which began to be communicated last night, apply to all employees making $50,000 or more. They are tiered cuts, with people making $50-99,000 seeing salary cut by 20%, those making $100k-$499,000 seeing $25% cuts and those making $500,000 or more getting 30% cuts.
Drellich reported that a Red Sox employee told him that “people are livid” over the fact that those making $100K are being treated the same way as those making $500K. And, yes, that does seem to be a pretty wide spread for similar pay cuts. One would think that a team with as many analytically-oriented people on staff could perhaps break things down a bit more granularly.
Notable in all of this that the same folks who own the Red Sox — Fenway Sports Group — own Liverpool FC of the English Premier League, and that just last month Liverpool’s pay cut/employee furlough policies proved so unpopular that they led to a backlash and a subsequent reversal by the club. That came after intense criticism from Liverpool fan groups and local politicians. Sox owner John Henry must be confident that no such backlash will happen in Boston.
As we noted yesterday, The Kansas City Royals, who are not as financially successful as the Boston Red Sox, have not furloughed employees or cut pay as a result of baseball’s shutdown in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Perhaps someone in Boston could call the Royals and ask them how they managed that.