Who should you root for in the playoffs? Who should you root against?


Two thirds of all baseball teams are done for the year. That means that two thirds of all baseball fans, more or less anyway, no longer have a primary rooting interest in the playoffs. In this instance you have two options: (1) tune out of baseball for October and concentrate on football, politics or, I dunno, reading books or spending time with your loved ones; or (2) jumping on some other team’s bandwagon and rooting for them for a month.

Pick option (2). It’s way better. Football is dumb, books are overrated and your family will be there in November. Probably. Anyway, allow me to help you pick which team to root for this October:


Pro: If you ever hated the Red Sox, it probably developed several years back. While David Ortiz and Dustin Pedroia are still around, the cast has changed pretty significantly since their 2000s rise, and the cast just comes off as a ton more likable than you might’ve considered older editions of this team to be. Mookie Betts and Jackie Bradley Jr. are a joy to watch. They have a knuckleballer. Even if you can’t stand David Ortiz, his final postseason is historic. It isn’t 2007 anymore and Jonathan Papelbon isn’t here. You can let go of all that old baggage if you want.

Con: If you’re the sort to root for underdogs, this is not your team. The cast may have changed some, but the franchise did win it all in 2013 and two other times in the living memory of even high school kids. Despite that, and despite the success of the Patriots, Bruins and Celtics, Boston fans still have this bad habit of acting as if rooting for their teams is some kind of cursed torture, so maybe it’s someone else’s turn.


Pro: It’ll be good to get in the habit of rooting for a Canadian team in case Trump wins the election and you feel obliged to move there.

Con: The Jays have a growing reputation of being snippy. More shockingly, some of their fans have even gotten a little unwritten-rules-y, which is amazing given the whole Jose Bautista bat flip thing last year. Also: it’s really hard to be a bandwagon fan of a team that plays on fake turf in a dome. If you’re gonna cheat on your first love, don’t do it in the baseball equivalent of a shabby hotel on the outskirts of town.


Pro: The longer the O’s stay alive the more likely it is that someone in the press is going to say something dumb about Adam Jones and his comments in the wake of the Colin Kaepernick stuff a couple of weeks ago. Also: a good chance some sports writer makes up for his lack of knowledge about Baltimore by using hackneyed references to “The Wire.” That’s pure entertainment.

Con: Eh, no real huge one. If you don’t like all-or-nothing hitters, you won’t like the Orioles that much. And of course, given how teams with all-or-nothing hitters have done in the playoffs in recent years, you may not have your secondary rooting interest for long if you choose the O’s.


Pro: Everyone talks about the Cubs 108-year drought, but the Indians are the true underdog story here. While their drought isn’t as long as the Cubs’ drought is, it has been 68 years. If you’re under 68, there is no functional difference between the two. It’s all prehistory. Second of all, the Cubs are on the brink of ending their drought due to a well-funded and superstar executive-led rebuild. The Indians, meanwhile, have been looking for loose change in cushions for years and have served as the farm team for every other team’s front office talent. That’s real underdog stuff. Finally, the Cavs won this year. Two championships in a city that hadn’t had any for 50 years prior would be pretty spiffy.

Cons: Wahoo. Sorry, can’t ever get fully behind a team that has a racist caricature as its mascot. They don’t deserve the money from your merch and the world does not need that red-faced monstrosity on national telecasts and front pages of newspapers any more than is humanly necessary.


Pro: I feel like the tide has turned on Adrian Beltre and Carlos Beltran as Hall of Fame candidates. For years they were criminally underrated — still are in some ways — and I suspected that they’d get short shrift as candidates when their days came. In the past year or so, however, the consensus has shifted a good deal and most are finally appreciating how good they have been for so long. Particularly Beltre. As such, even if the Rangers don’t win it, I think they’re safe for induction one day. But a World Series title would put a cherry on top.

Cons: There aren’t a ton on the baseball side — the Rangers are a pretty likable team — but if you have to find one, you could go with the weirdness of the Rangers playing for a world title in a packed stadium, gussied up all nice for TV, while the Rangers owners are busy campaigning for a new stadium to replace it, funded with the tax dollars of the very people packing the “old” one. If they win it all, I suspect it will create enough goodwill for the Rangers brand that the election which will determine whether the club gets all that money from taxpayers will go in their favor and, man, billionaires don’t deserve those kinds of handouts.


Pro: Your mileage may vary on Dusty Baker’s managerial prowess, but it’s hard not to like the guy and it’d be cool to see him get a ring as a manager. He might say something inexplicably cool too, and that’s a bonus. Bryce Harper has largely been a non-factor this year, but if he can fight through his physical ailments and lead the Nats to glory, it’d go a long way toward helping the Make Baseball Fun Again cause.

Con: Harper is telling Expos fans from back in the day to get behind the Nationals. This has always been a tough topic. Expos fans that I know want their own team back in Montreal and, even if they had some allegiance to former Expos players when the Nats first started, they’re all gone now. Likewise, the Nats have always been inconsistent and at times dismissive of their Expos heritage, so this appeal is not likely to go anyplace. It’s just a lot of bad karma, and that’s before you realize that a deep playoff run for the Nats is going to create a public transit disaster. Not that that’s your problem.


Pro: Yoenis Cespedes, Bartolo Colon and Noah Syndergaard are fun to watch. New York in October is pretty. I dunno, given how much coverage they get, your opinions about the Mets are likely already baked, so joining that bandwagon is not a hard calculus for you one way or another. As an idea — the underdog team in New York — the Mets are pretty likable. In practice it varies.

Con: The longer the Mets go, the more likely it is we’ll get Jose Reyes redemption stories. We came dangerously close to that today, actually, but Klapisch held just short. Someone will do it, though, and it’ll be terrible. You can root for a team with a jerk like Reyes on it without compromising your principles. Separating art from artist is possible and, on a baseball team, there are a lot of alternative artists. But it can be a large enough drag to deter bandwagoning with ’em.


Pro: They’re the big story, right? Best team in the game on the verge of erasing 108 years of futility? For much as that will be pounded into our heads over the next few weeks and for as tired as we’ll get of that narrative, it’s still a legit point. You don’t have to buy-in 100% or think all of that is the best thing ever to appreciate that it is special. Beyond that, Kris Bryant and Anthony Rizzo are superstars who deserve to shine on the national stage. Dexter Fowler is a great guy. They’re a fun team to watch.

Con: The stuff I said about Jose Reyes applies for Aroldis Chapman. Beyond that, being a contrarian can be fun and, if the Cubs make it to the World Series, the bandwagon Cubs fans are gonna be crawling out of the woodwork and that can get insufferable at some point. Heck, even Hillary Clinton may remember that, at varying times anyway, she claimed to be one. I’m happy the Yankees aren’t in the playoffs because who needs ’em, but part of me does wish that they had made it and faced off against the Cubs in the World Series, creating a crisis for Team Clinton with respect to which team she’d claim to like the most. It’d be the most Clinton thing ever.


Pro: The Dodgers will probably be my adopted rooting interest this postseason, for reasons I’ve explained in the past. I don’t really hew to the idea that adults can have “second favorite teams” but if we can, I suppose mine is the Dodgers. If for no other reason than that I have watched more of their games than almost any other team’s the past three or four years. And you all know I have a Puig crush, so here we are. For the rest of you: Clayton Kershaw is the best pitcher on the planet and Corey Seager is one of the game’s most exciting young players. Finally, though Vin Scully won’t be calling any playoff games, there would be something nice and appropriate for the Dodgers to win it all in his last season as a broadcaster.

Con: If your reason for not liking the Yankees back in the day was payroll stuff, you probably hate the Dodgers for the same reason. There are worse reasons to dislike a team, especially if you’re prone to root for the underdog, which they will never, ever be in any real circumstances.


Pro: Dynasties, even erratic ones, like their every-other-year pattern are kind of neat. If the Giants win another one, you’ll be able to say that you saw one. That’s something.

Con: This Even Year B.S. is getting to be a bit much. Even the Giants have adopted it as their postseason slogan. Sorry, I’ll never sign on to voodoo or cosmic coincidence as the ethos of or the explanation for the success of a sports team. The universe is a cold and indifferent place and cares not a wit for humanity. To think for a moment that it would humor us by acknowledging our artificial measurements of time (this is only an “even year” to a subset of people on one particular planet orbiting one of billions and billions of stars), let alone manipulate events to make it so that one of our sports teams has success during one of those phony years is the height of arrogance. I rather like a lot of Giants players, think Bruce Bochy is a great manager, love the city of San Francisco and find Giants fans to be some of the more pleasant fans I have ever encountered, but I’d sooner root for a meteor strike this month than root for the Giants to win it all. Not because I hold anything against them, but because that would make the universe make more sense to me.

But really, root for whoever you’d like.

Orioles option LHP Bruce Zimmermann to minors

Brent Skeen-USA TODAY Sports

SARASOTA, Fla. – The Baltimore Orioles have optioned left-handers Bruce Zimmermann and Nick Vespi and reassigned infielder Lewin Díaz, left-hander Darwinzon Hernandez and catcher Mark Kolozsvary to minor league camp.

The Orioles announced the moves Monday.

Baltimore’s spring training roster now has 46 players.

Zimmermann made 13 starts last season. He went 2-5 with a 5.99 ERA.

The competition for rotation spots with the Orioles has been a significant story during spring training, but after the team acquired Cole Irvin and Kyle Gibson in the offseason – and with top prospect Grayson Rodriguez in the mix as well – there were a lot of pitchers Zimmermann needed to beat out.