Josh Donaldson calls out baseball’s beanball culture

Getty Images
76 Comments

There is a culture in baseball which dictates that, at various times, it’s appropriate to throw a ball at a high rate of speed at someone’s body as some sort of punishment or as a show of dominance. Sure, players and managers always deny that a specific pitch was aimed at a batter intentionally so they won’t get in trouble for it, but everyone acknowledges that, in general, pitches are thrown at guys on purpose for any number of slights, real or perceived.

Toronto Blue Jays third baseman Josh Donaldson was thrown at twice yesterday. Given some chirping back and forth between Donaldson and the Twins bench during the series and given Donaldson staring at the Twins bench after an earlier home run, it was almost certainly intentional. It likewise seemed intentional given that the man throwing the pitches — Phil Hughes — has excellent control and the ball was unlikely to “slip” on him the way pitchers often claim such pitches slip. In this case even the umps didn’t buy it, tossing Donaldson’s manager out of the game for coming out and arguing that, hey, maybe it’s not cool for Phil Hughes to be throwing at a guy.

What can’t be denied is that Donaldson has had it with baseball’s unwritten rules regarding purpose pitches, plunkings and beanballs aimed at policing player deportment. Here he is venting after yesterday’s game:

“Major League Baseball has to do something about this. They say they’re trying to protect players. They make a rule that says you can’t slide hard into second base. They make a rule to protect the catchers on slides into home. But when you throw a ball at somebody, nothing’s done about it. My manager comes out to ask what’s going on and he gets ejected for it. That’s what happens.

“I just don’t get the point. I don’t get what baseball’s trying to prove. If I’m a young kid watching these games, why would I want to play baseball? Why? If I do something well or if somebody doesn’t like something that I do, it’s, ‘Oh, well, I’m gonna throw at you now.’ It doesn’t make sense. It just doesn’t make sense to me.”

Donaldson is right on the money. Defenders of beanball culture always say “that’s just how baseball is,” and cite the codes and traditions of the game, often glamorizing violence as they do it. While we deal with a literal crisis in brain injuries in other sports, people still romanticize Bob Gibson or Don Drysdale planting one in someone’e ear. While we talk about how awful it is that a player, say, breaks his hand while making a diving catch, we talk about throwing pitches that could easily break someone’s hand as if it were some necessary and immutable part of the game. While we talk about the importance of playing the game the right way and keeping one’s emotions in check on the field, we validate and make excuses for what are essentially temper tantrums in the form of fastballs to someone’s ribs, backside or behind their back.

It doesn’t have to be that way. It doesn’t have to be that way because keeping it that way is going to get people hurt, just as players have always been hurt by errant pitches. But it also doesn’t have to be that way because baseball players are adults who should be able to handle their business without the need to resort to petty and misguided revenge.

Royals’ John Sherman optimistic about new ballpark, current team

Denny Medley-USA TODAY Sports
0 Comments

KANSAS CITY, Mo. – The first thing that Kansas City Royals owner John Sherman thinks about when he wakes up each morning is how the club, stuck in what seems like an interminable rebuild, will play on that particular day.

Not where they will play four or five years down the road.

Yet given the modest expectations for a team that lost nearly 100 games a year ago, it makes sense many Royals fans are just as interested – quite possibly more so – in the plans for a downtown ballpark than whether infielder Bobby Witt Jr. can double down on his brilliant rookie season or pitcher Brady Singer can truly become a staff ace.

That’s why Sherman’s second thought probably moves to the downtown ballpark, too.

“This is a huge decision, and I look at it as maybe the most important decision we’ll make as long as we have the privilege of stewarding this team,” Sherman said before the Royals held a final workout Wednesday ahead of opening day. “I’m probably as anxious as you to get moving on that, but it’s a complicated process.”

The Royals have called Kauffman Stadium home since the sister to Arrowhead Stadium, the home of the Super Bowl champion Kansas City Chiefs, opened 50 years ago next month.

And while most stadiums are replaced because they have become outdated, the unique, space-aged look of Kauffman Stadium – built during an era in which teams trended toward impersonal, multisport concrete donuts for their homes – remains beloved by Royals fans and visitors alike.

The problem is that despite numerous renovations over the years, the very concrete holding the ballpark together has begun to crumble in places. The cost simply to repair and maintain the ballpark has become prohibitive.

So with the decision essentially made for them to build an entirely new stadium, the Royals revealed plans to build an entire development in the same mold of The Battery Atlanta, where the Braves built Truist Park, and the Ballpark Village in St. Louis, where the new Busch Stadium is merely the centerpiece of a whole entertainment district.

No site has been secured, but several of the most promising are in downtown Kansas City, where the Power & Light District along with T-Mobile Center have spearheaded a successful era of urban renewal.

Sherman has said that private funds would cover the majority of the stadium cost and the entire village, each carrying a price tag of about $1 billion.

But if any public funding will be used, as it was to build and maintain Kauffman Stadium, then it would need to be voted upon, and the earliest that it could show up on a ballot would be August.

“You look at Atlanta, they took some raw ground – they started with 85 acres – and that has been a complete home run,” said Sherman, who purchased the Royals in August 2019, shortly before the pandemic wreaked havoc on team finances.

“This is one of the reasons we want to do this: That’s helped the Braves become more competitive,” Sherman said of the vast potential for increased revenue for one of the smallest-market teams in baseball. “They have locked up and extended the core of their future, and the Braves are in a great position from a baseball standpoint.”

So perhaps the first two thoughts Sherman has each day – about performance and the future – are one and the same.

When it comes to the team itself, the Royals were largely quiet throughout the winter, though that was by design.

Rather than spending heavily on free agents that might help them win a few more games, they decided to stay the course with a promising young roster in the hopes that the development of those players would yield better results.

In fact, Sherman said, the club has been discussing extensions for some of the Royals’ foundational pieces – presumably Witt, who was fourth in voting for AL rookie of the year, and Singer, who was 10-5 with a 3.23 ERA last season.

“We’re having conversations about that as we speak,” Sherman said. “We have a number of young players that we’re trying to evaluate and we’re talking to their representatives about what might work.”

Just because the Royals’ roster largely looks the same, that doesn’t mean nothing has changed. The Royals fired longtime general manager Dayton Moore in September and moved J.J. Picollo to the role, then fired manager Mike Matheny in October and replaced him with longtime Indians and Rays coach Matt Quatraro.

Sherman said the new voices created a palpable energy in spring training that he hopes carries into the regular season.

“When we acquired the team, we had three primary objectives,” Sherman said. “One was to win more games; we’re working on that. The second was to secure the future; that’s what (the stadium) is. And the third was to do good in the community.

“But the first priority,” he said, “is really the on-field product. That’s what really lifts everything else up.”