Associated Press

Mike Leake becomes a rare single-digit-wearing pitcher

18 Comments

Mike Leake was just formally announced as the newest member of the St. Louis Cardinals. At his press conference they showed his jersey: number 8. Which is really, really unusual for a pitcher.

Indeed, pitchers hardly ever wear single-digit numbers. At any given time there are a couple around. Marcus Stroman is the only one I could think of off the top of my head. He wears number 6. I asked Twitter for others and was reminded that Adam Ottavino wears 0. Kyle Drabek did before 2015 but he switched when he joined the White Sox. That may be the entire list.

Ten years ago Stefan Fastis of the Wall Street Journal wrote a story about single-digit pitchers. In it he explained the historical basis for the practice. The first team to go with numbers and stick with them was the Yankees, and they assigned numbers by batting order position. The number three hitter was #3 Babe Ruth, the cleanup hitter was #4 Lou Gehrig, etc. Catchers — like Bill Dickey — wore 8. A pitcher batted ninth but the backup catcher would get 9 and backup fielders the lower double digit numbers. Eventually, someplace in the teens, you’d get to the pitchers. That system eventually broke down, but the tradition remained.

Fastis’ story also revealed, however, that in modern times pitchers rarely wearing single digits is simply a matter of tradition and superstition and irrational aesthetic preference. There he talked to an equipment manager and a historian about it and it was revealed that it just seems weird to people for a pitcher to have a single digit. The story also contains a very Reggie Jackson quote about just how WRONG it was for a pitcher to wear a single digit. Like so many things in baseball, it’s just a matter of calcified orthodoxy. Like “playing the game the right way.”

Which makes Leake’s choice even more fun. I mean, Leake plays for the St. Louis Cardinals. A club which, justified or not, is often accused of absolutely abhorring the notion of people not playing the game the right way. Here’s hoping he sticks to his number 8 and isn’t told that he needs to do things . . . by the numbers.

Cubs owner Tom Ricketts continues to cry poor

Tom Ricketts
Nuccio DiNuzzo/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images
3 Comments

MLB owners and the MLB Players Association continue to hash out details, some in public, about a 2020 baseball season. The owners have been suggesting a shorter season, claiming that they lose money on every game played without fans in attendance. The union wants a longer season, since players are — as per the March agreement — being paid a prorated salary. Players thus make more money over the 114 games the MLBPA suggested than the 50 or so the owners want.

Cubs chairman Tom Ricketts has been among the more vocal owners in recent weeks, claiming that the coronavirus pandemic and the ensuing shutdown of MLB has greatly hurt MLB owners’ business. Speaking to ESPN’s Jesse Rogers, Ricketts claimed, “The scale of losses across the league is biblical.”

Ricketts said, “Here’s something I hope baseball fans understand. Most baseball owners don’t take money out of their team. They raise all the revenue they can from tickets and media rights, and they take out their expenses, and they give all the money left to their GM to spend.” Ricketts continued, “The league itself does not make a lot of cash. I think there is a perception that we hoard cash and we take money out and it’s all sitting in a pile we’ve collected over the years. Well, it isn’t. Because no one anticipated a pandemic. No one expects to have to draw down on the reserves from the past. Every team has to figure out a way to plug the hole.”

Pertaining to Ricketts’ claim that “the league itself does not make a lot of cash,” Forbes reported in December that, for the 17th consecutive season, MLB set a new revenue record, this time at $10.7 billion. In accounting, revenues are calculated before factoring in expenses, but unless the league has $10 billion in expenses, I cannot think of a way in which Ricketts’ statement can be true.

MLB owners notably don’t open their accounting books to the public. Because the owners were crying poor during negotiations, the MLBPA asked them to provide proof of financial distress. The owners haven’t provided those documents. Thus, unless Ricketts opens his books, his claim can be proven neither true nor false, and should be taken with the largest of salt grains. If owners really are hurting as badly as they say they are, they should be more than willing to prove it. That they don’t readily provide that proof suggests they are being misleading.

It’s worth noting that the Ricketts family has a history of not being forthcoming about their money. Cubs co-owner Todd Ricketts got into hot water last year after it was found he had used inaccurate information when paying property taxes. In 2007, he bought two properties and demolished both, building a new, state-of-the-art house. For years, Ricketts used information pertaining to the older, demolished property rather than the current property, which drastically lowered his property taxes. Based on the adjustment, Ricketts’ property taxes increased from $828,000 to $1.96 million for 2019, according to The Chicago Tribune. Ricketts also had to pay back taxes for the previous three years.

At any rate, the owners want to pass off the financial risk of doing business onto their labor force. As we have noted here countless times, there is inherent risk in doing business. Owning a Major League Baseball team has, for decades, been nearly risk-free, which has benefited both the owners and, to a lesser extent, its workforce. The pandemic has thrown a wrench into everybody’s plans, but the financial losses these last three months are part of the risk. Furthermore, when teams have done much better business than expected, the owners haven’t benevolently spread that wealth out to their players, so why should the players forfeit even more of their pay than they already are when times are tough?