The Rockies just had a brilliant idea

11 Comments

source:

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. — It’s Day 5 for me here in Arizona and I’m about to take in Game 6. Not too shabby. Today’s matchup: the White Sox vs. the Rockies. It’s a battle of lefties: Jose Quintana vs. Tyler Matzek. Quintana has pitched well so far this spring, allowing one run on three hits in four spring innings. That creep can roll. I don’t have the White Sox’ lineup yet, but the Rockies are trotting out Tulowitzki, Morneau, Drew Stubbs and a generally major league sort of lineup. It’s a sleepy, normal day in spring training. A day after Ferrell-fest, that’s probably a good thing.

I’ve been walking around Salt River Fields here this morning and, as always, it’s fantastic. A great facility. Great view. Wide concourses. Nice people. And the home team’s social media folks are on point too. I happened upon this cool glove, and tweeted the photo out:

The Rockies in response:

That’s pretty brilliant, actually. Really, every day should be Prince Day.

Oh, and because I have been criminally negligent in posting equipment bag pics:

source:

Let’s have a fun game and a day with no pitcher injuries, OK? I would love a day with no pitcher injuries.

Max Scherzer: ‘There’s no reason to engage with MLB in any further compensation reductions’

Max Scherzer
Mark Brown/Getty Images
3 Comments

MLBPA player representative Max Scherzer sent out a short statement late Wednesday night regarding the ongoing negotiations between the owners and the union. On Tuesday, ownership proposed a “sliding scale” salary structure on top of the prorated pay cuts the players already agreed to back in March. The union rejected the proposal, with many worrying that it would drive a wedge in the union’s constituency.

Scherzer is one of eight players on the MLBPA executive subcommittee along with Andrew Miller, Daniel Murphy, Elvis Andrus, Cory Gearrin, Chris Iannetta, James Paxton, and Collin McHugh.

Scherzer’s statement:

After discussing the latest developments with the rest of the players there’s no reason to engage with MLB in any further compensation reductions. We have previously negotiated a pay cut in the version of prorated salaries, and there’s no justification to accept a 2nd pay cut based upon the current information the union has received. I’m glad to hear other players voicing the same viewpoint and believe MLB’s economic strategy would completely change if all documentation were to become public information.

Indeed, aside from the Braves, every other teams’ books are closed, so there has been no way to fact-check any of the owners’ claims. Cubs chairman Tom Ricketts, for example, recently said that 70 percent of the Cubs’ revenues come from “gameday operations” (ticket sales, concessions, etc.). But it went unsubstantiated because the Cubs’ books are closed. The league has only acknowledged some of the union’s many requests for documentation. Without supporting evidence, Ricketts’ claim, like countless others from team executives, can only be taken as an attempt to manipulate public sentiment.

Early Thursday morning, ESPN’s Jeff Passan reported that the MLBPA plans to offer a counter-proposal to MLB in which the union would suggest a season of more than 100 games and fully guaranteed prorated salaries. It seems like the two sides are quite far apart, so it may take longer than expected for them to reach an agreement.