Trea Turner’s agent is unhappy his client is in limbo after trade to Nationals

49 Comments

As part of this week’s three-team Wil Myers trade, the Nationals acquired right-hander Joe Ross and a player to be named later. However, the player to be named later isn’t a mystery. It’s shortstop prospect Trea Turner, who is now in limbo after the trade.

You see, Turner was a first-round pick of the Padres in this June’s First-Year Player Draft. And per MLB rules, he can’t be traded until one year after signing his first contract. That means that he will begin the 2015 season with the Padres, even though everybody knows that he is going to the Nationals. And that’s pretty awkward for everyone involved.

Turner’s agent, Jeff Barry, told FOX Sports’ Ken Rosenthal that the situation is “unconscionable” and that he “will vigorously pursue all available courses of action to remedy this situation.” He even brought up the possibility of filing a grievance through the MLBPA.

“Regardless of the sham press releases being put out by teams, there is no Player to be Named, there is only the player already named, and that player is Trea Turner,” Berry said.

“Trea is one of the top prospects in baseball and on a fast track to the major leagues,” Berry said. “In this case, the plan to ‘trust us’ is not enough when it comes to a player’s well-being and career.

“Given the circumstances and the undoubtedly negative impact on Trea Turner, for the teams involved and Major League Baseball to endorse and approve this trade is not only unethical, but also goes against the very spirit of the Minor League Uniform Player Contract that players sign when they first enter professional baseball. That contract requires a player to ‘serve the club diligently and faithfully.’ Shouldn’t the clubs and the controlling parties at Major League Baseball be held to the same standard?”

As Rosenthal notes, Turner has a minor league contract, so his plight might not be on the MLBPA’s radar.

Nationals general manager Mike Rizzo can’t discuss Turner directly, which shows how silly this situation is, but he told Mark Zuckerman of CSNWashington.com yesterday that he trusts the that Padres will handle the unspecified player (who is obviously Turner) with care before he comes over to his new team.

“It’s a unique situation that hasn’t been done before,” Rizzo said. “I’ve never done it before, and I’ve been doing this thing for a long time. We’re going to trust each other and do what’s right by the player. We’ll monitor that player quite closely. We trust that the Padres will do right by him and do the right thing.”

Rizzo wouldn’t address whether there’s an agreed-upon contingency plan in the event something happens to Turner before June but confirmed there are other players the Nationals ultimately could select.

“We’ve got a list that we’ll chose the player from,” Rizzo said. “Let’s leave it at that.”

The rule keeping Turner on the Nationals is essentially aimed at preventing teams from trading their draft picks. We have seen situations similar to this with “players to be named later” before, but it usually comes up around the July 31 non-waiver trade deadline. However, those players don’t end up spending long stretches of time with their old team before coming to their new one. I’m not sure what the answer is for Turner and future situations like this, but it definitely feels silly.

MLBPA proposes 114-game season, playoff expansion to MLB

LG Patterson/MLB via Getty Images
2 Comments

ESPN’s Jeff Passan reports that the Major League Baseball Players Association has submitted a proposal to the league concerning the 2020 season. The proposal includes a 114-game season with an end date on October 31, playoff expansion for two years, the right for players to opt out of the season, and a potential deferral of 2020 salaries if the postseason were to be canceled.

Passan clarifies that among the players who choose to opt out, only those that are considered “high risk” would still receive their salaries. The others would simply receive service time. The union also proposed that the players receive a non-refundable $100 million sum advance during what would essentially be Spring Training 2.

If the regular season were to begin in early July, as has often been mentioned as the target, that would give the league four months to cram in 114 games. There would have to be occasional double-headers, or the players would have to be okay with few off-days. Nothing has been mentioned about division realignment or a geographically-oriented schedule, but those could potentially ease some of the burden.

Last week, the owners made their proposal to the union, suggesting a “sliding scale” salary structure. The union did not like that suggestion. Players were very vocal about it, including on social media as Max Scherzer — one of eight players on the union’s executive subcommittee — made a public statement. The owners will soon respond to the union’s proposal. They almost certainly won’t be happy with many of the details, but the two sides can perhaps find a starting point and bridge the gap. As the calendar turns to June, time is running out for the two sides to hammer out an agreement on what a 2020 season will look like.