“Strong possibility” the Phillies trade Marlon Byrd

22 Comments

Marlon Byrd has the ability to block a deal to four different teams thanks to a clause in his contract, but Joel Sherman of the New York Post reports that there’s a “strong possibility” the Phillies trade the 37-year-old outfielder.

That makes sense, because a rebuilding team doesn’t have much use for a 37-year-old with one season remaining on his contract, but the Phillies declined to trade him in July and then pulled him back off revocable waivers in August.

Byrd had a decent season, hitting .264 with 25 homers and a .757 OPS despite a ghastly 185/35 K/BB ratio in 154 games, but he’s owed $8 million in 2015 and has a vesting option for 2016 based on playing time.

The Royals are paying everyone. Why can’t all of the other teams?

Getty Images
2 Comments

Over the past several weeks we’ve heard a lot of news about teams furloughing front office and scouting staff, leveling pay cuts for those who remain and, most recently, ceasing stipends to minor league players and releasing them en masse. The message being sent, intentionally or otherwise, is that baseball teams are feeling the pinch.

The Kansas City Royals, however, are a different story.

Jon Heyman reported this afternoon that the Royals are paying their minor leaguers through August 31, which is when the minor league season would’ve ended, and unlike so many other teams, they are not releasing players either. Jeff Passan, meanwhile, reports that the Royals will not lay any team employees off or furlough anyone. “Nearly 150 employees will not take pay cuts,” he says, though “higher-level employees will take tiered cuts.” Passan adds that the organization intends to restore the lost pay due to those higher-level employees in the future when revenue ramps back up, making them whole.

While baseball finances are murky at best and opaque in most instances, most people agree that the Royals are one of the lower-revenue franchises in the game. They are also near the bottom as far as franchise value goes. Finally, they have the newest ownership group in all of baseball, which means that the group almost certainly has a lot of debt and very little if any equity in the franchise. Any way you slice it, cashflow is likely tighter in Kansas City than almost anywhere else.

Yet the Royals are paying minor leaguers and front office employees while a great number of other teams are not. What’s their excuse?