Royals shortstop Alcides Escobar led off Game 3 of the World Series with a double to left field off of Giants starter Tim Hudson, and the Royals quickly capitalized. After moving Escobar to third base on an Alex Gordon ground out, Lorenzo Cain brought him home with a ground out of his own to shortstop Brandon Crawford.
The Royals kept threatening in the second inning, putting on the first two batters of the frame against a shaky Hudson. But Salvador Perez was robbed of a hit on a line drive by a sprawling Travis Ishikawa in left field, and then Hudson induced a 4-6-3 double play out of Jarrod Dyson to keep the Giants’ deficit at one run. Hudson was able to cut through the Royals with very little issue in the third.
Royals starter Jeremy Guthrie yielded a pair of second-inning singles, one of which was erased when Hunter Pence was caught attempting to steal second base. Other than that, the Giants haven’t been able to mount an attack against the right-hander.
The Rays started Sergio Romo on back-to-back days and if that sounds weird to you, you’re not alone. Romo, of course, was the star closer for the Giants for a while, helping them win the World Series in 2012 and ’14. He’s been a full-time reliever dating back to 2006, when he was at Single-A.
In an effort to prevent lefty Ryan Yarbrough from facing the righty-heavy top of the Angels’ lineup (Zack Cozart, Mike Trout, Justin Upton), Romo started Saturday’s game, pitching the first inning before giving way to Yarbrough in the second. Romo struck out the side, in fact. The Rays went on to win 5-3.
The Rays did it again on Sunday afternoon, starting Romo. This time, he got four outs before giving way to Matt Andriese. Romo walked two without giving up a hit while striking out three. The Angels managed to win 5-2 however.
Despite Sunday’s win, Cozart wasn’t a happy camper with the way the Rays used Romo. Via Fabian Ardaya of The Athletic, Cozart said, “It was weird … It’s bad for baseball, in my opinion … It’s spring training. That’s the best way to explain it.”
It’s difficult to see merit in Cozart’s argument. It’s not like the Rays were making excessive amounts of pitching changes; they used five on Saturday and four on Sunday. The games lasted three hours and three hours, 15 minutes, respectively. The average game time is exactly three hours so far this season. I’m having trouble wondering how else Cozart might mean the strategy is bad for baseball.
It seems like the real issue is that Cozart is afraid of the sport changing around him. The Rays, like most small market teams, have to find their edges in slight ways. The Rays aren’t doing this blindly; the strategy makes sense based on their opponents’ starting lineup. The idea of valuing on-base percentage was scoffed at. Shifting was scoffed at and now every team employs them to some degree. Who knows if starting a reliever for the first three or four outs will become a trend, but it’s shortsighted to write it off at first glance.