John Lowe of the Detroit Free Press has the story from Boston:
Jhonny Peralta is a free agent, and the Tigers have filled his position with Jose Iglesias.
So early this morning, in a corner of the cramped clubhouse after the season ended, Peralta was asked, “Have you thought about telling the Tigers you would be willing to play left field” — his newly adopted position — “in order to stay here?”
Peralta said: “There’s a chance for sure, yeah, because I like the organization here. Do I want to be here? Yeah, I want to be here.”
The problem with that is corner outfield prospect Nick Castellanos is just about ready for everyday playing time at the major league level.
And the Tigers also have Andy Dirks, who is arbitration-eligible for the first time this winter.
Peralta — a client of SFX — will likely make more money if he pitches himself as a shortstop anyway. The 31-year-old batted .303/.358/.457 in 107 games this year before being hit with a 50-game PED suspension.
It’s a safe bet — unless there’s some sort of injury or trade — that Jhonny won’t be back in Detroit.
Even Drellich of The Athletic reports that the Boston Red Sox are cutting the pay of team employees. Those cuts, which began to be communicated last night, apply to all employees making $50,000 or more. They are tiered cuts, with people making $50-99,000 seeing salary cut by 20%, those making $100k-$499,000 seeing $25% cuts and those making $500,000 or more getting 30% cuts.
Drellich reported that a Red Sox employee told him that “people are livid” over the fact that those making $100K are being treated the same way as those making $500K. And, yes, that does seem to be a pretty wide spread for similar pay cuts. One would think that a team with as many analytically-oriented people on staff could perhaps break things down a bit more granularly.
Notable in all of this that the same folks who own the Red Sox — Fenway Sports Group — own Liverpool FC of the English Premier League, and that just last month Liverpool’s pay cut/employee furlough policies proved so unpopular that they led to a backlash and a subsequent reversal by the club. That came after intense criticism from Liverpool fan groups and local politicians. Sox owner John Henry must be confident that no such backlash will happen in Boston.
As we noted yesterday, The Kansas City Royals, who are not as financially successful as the Boston Red Sox, have not furloughed employees or cut pay as a result of baseball’s shutdown in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Perhaps someone in Boston could call the Royals and ask them how they managed that.