Orioles decline $11 million option on Mark Reynolds

11 Comments

Baltimore has declined its $11 million team option on Mark Reynolds after he set a career-low in slugging percentage while being moved from third base to first base.

However, because he’s still an arbitration-eligible player Reynolds does not simply become an outright free agent. Instead, as Brittany Ghiroli of MLB.com reports, the Orioles have until November 30 to decide if they want to offer him arbitration.

If they do that, he’d likely get a raise on this year’s $7.5 million salary, but perhaps to a lesser amount than the $11 million option. If instead they non-tender Reynolds the 29-year-old slugger will hit the open market with a $500,000 buyout.

Reynolds would be an interesting free agent because despite hitting just .213 during the past three seasons and striking out as much as any hitter in baseball he’s never posted an OPS below .750 and has 35-homer power. In a weak year for first basemen it wouldn’t be surprising to see him get a multi-year deal from a team in need of right-handed power.

White Sox to extend protective netting to the foul poles

Getty Images
1 Comment

Recently two more fans suffered serious injuries as the result of hard-hit foul balls at major league games. One of those fans was hurt at a White Sox game at Guaranteed Rate Field earlier this month. In response, the White Sox have taken it upon themselves to do that which Major League Baseball will not require and extend protective netting. From the Chicago Sun-Times:

The White Sox and Illinois Sports Facilities Authority are planning to extend the protective netting at Guaranteed Rate Field down the lines to the foul poles, according to a source.

Exact details will be announced later, but the changes will be made as soon as possible this season.

If recent history holds, they will not be the last team to do it.

Major League Baseball has taken a laissez-faire approach to protective netting over the past several years, requiring nothing even if it has made recommendations to teams to do something. The last time it made a suggestion was in December 2015 when teams were “encouraged” to shield the seats between the near ends of both dugouts and within 70 feet of home plate. In the wake of that recommendation only a few teams immediately extended their netting, primarily because if you ask a business to do something but say it is not required to do anything, it is not likely to do anything.

It would not be until September 2017, after a baby girl was severely injured at Yankee Stadium, that the rest of baseball was inspired to extend protective netting in keeping with MLB’s recommendations. Indeed, it was a land rush, with all 30 teams extending their netting by Opening Day 2018. While a generous interpretation would have everyone seeing the light simultaneously, my slightly more experienced eye saw it as a “don’t be the only team not to have extended netting by the time the next lawsuit hits” approach.

In the wake of the two recent injuries Major League Baseball issued a statement about how it “will keep examining” the matter of additional protective netting while, again, mandating nothing. Now that the White Sox are extending netting to the foul poles, however,  it’s not hard to imagine a situation in which other teams follow suit. Sooner or later, enough will likely have done so to create critical mass and make any team which has not done so to make the effort out of self-preservation.

Or, more generously, good sense.