Tigers rebound for ALCS Game 1 victory over Yankees

24 Comments

Raul Ibanez provided another dose of postseason heroics for the Yankees on Saturday evening in Game 1 of the ALCS, but it didn’t matter in the end.

The Tigers rallied after Jose Valverde’s ugly ninth-inning blowup, tacking on two runs in the top of the 12th inning in an eventual 6-4 victory in The Bronx.

Delmon Young finished 3-for-6 with a home run, a double and three RBI, Austin Jackson had a triple, a double and a run scored, and starter Doug Fister tossed 6 1/3 innings of scoreless ball as Detroit grabbed a 1-0 lead in this best-of-seven clash.

The Yankees not only failed to capitalize on what was a rousing comeback but now face a dire set of circumstances going forward in this series. Derek Jeter is done for the playoffs with a fractured left ankle and Hiroki Kuroda will be pitching on short rest in Game 2. If the Yankees can’t pull out a victory on Sunday evening, they’ll be down two games heading into Detroit, where Justin Verlander will take the ball in Game 3.

Anything can happen — as we’ve seen time and time again in this crazy sport, especially in this particular postseason — but the situation certainly looks pretty grim right now for the fellas in pinstripes.

MLB rejected Players’ 114-game season proposal, will not send a counter

Rob Manfred
Getty Images
Leave a comment

Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reports that Major League Baseball has rejected the MLBPA’s proposal for a 114-game season and said it would not send a counter offer. The league said it has started talks with owners “about playing a shorter season without fans, and that it is ready to discuss additional ideas with the union.”

This should be understood as a game of chicken.

The background here is that the the owners are pretty much locked into the idea of paying players a prorated share of their regular salaries based on number of games played. The players, meanwhile, are pretty much locked in to the idea that the owners can set the length of the season that is played. Each side is trying to leverage their power in this regard.

The players proposed a probably unworkable number of games — 114 — as a means of setting the bidding high on a schedule that will work out well for them financially. Say, a settled agreement at about 80 games or so. The owners were rumored to be considering a counteroffer of a low number of games — say, 50 — as a means of still getting a significant pay cut from the players even if they’re being paid prorata. What Rosenthal is now reporting is that they won’t even counter with that.

Which is to say that the owners are trying to get the players to come off of their prorated salary rights under the threat of a very short schedule that would end up paying them very little. They won’t formally offer that short schedule, however, likely because (a) they believe that the threat of uncertain action is more formidable; and (b) they don’t want to be in the position of publicly demanding fewer baseball games, which doesn’t look very good to fans. They’d rather be in the position of saying “welp, the players wouldn’t talk to us about money so we have no choice, they forced us into 50 games.”

In other news, the NBA seems very close to getting its season resumed.