UPDATE: The Pirates renounce any connection to the Pirates Fan Advisor thing

37 Comments

UPDATE: There has been clarification from the team. This remains a dumb idea, but it is apparently not a team-endorsed dumb idea, the presence of team president Frank Coonelly on the website in question notwithstanding. In fact, they have asked that the video of Coonelly be removed from the site and issued a statement making it clear that they have nothing to do with this:

“The Pirates have no financial agreement or affiliation with PiratesFanAdvisor.com and receive no financial benefit in any way. The Pirates were approached by a long-time Pirates fan and Pirates Fantasy Camp goer, asking if the organization would consider feedback that he collected from the fans through his independent Web site in order to improve the experience at PNC Park.

“We agreed to consider any feedback he gathered as we are constantly seeking input from our fans. The fact we agreed to listen to whatever information is collected and agreed to shoot a brief online video communicating as much is the extent of the Pirates’ involvement inPiratesFanAdvisor.com. To avoid any confusion among our fans that we are in some way asking them to pay to provide us with their input, we have asked the video be removed from the site.

“All of the many, many channels of communication remain available to our fans. Whether it is through our online surveys, social media platforms, customer service department, guest services stations at the ballpark, season-ticket holder Q&A events, fan forums at public events such as PirateFest, e-mail, standard mail or the many other options, we actively encourage our fans to share their experiences and opinions with us.”

 

1:41: This is … odd.

The Pirates have set up something called the Fan Advisor Network. The upshot: they’re asking Pirates fans to pay the team money, ranging from $9.95 to $50 a month to become some sort of glorified focus group. From their website, where team president Frank Coonelly greets you with an awkwardly read video:

The concept is fairly simple:  Turn the most passionate and intelligent Pirate fans into consultants for the team that they love.  Never before has the objective “voice of the fan” been captured.  The Fan Advisor Network does so each and every week through its unique Fan Advisor Network Consulting System, a weekly single-question statistically valid survey.  Confidential weekly reports are generated  from this data and provided to the Pirates as well as to the Pirate Fan Advisors themselves.

In addition to being allowed to take part in the team’s weekly surveys there are what sound like message boards, lapel pins, some ticketing preferences and other swag, the niceness of which depends on what level of membership you sign up for. Bronze is $9.95 a month, Silver is $23.95 a month and Gold is $600 a year. Why they don’t just call that $50 a month is beyond me, but maybe some past focus group paid the team to tell it that $600 a year sounds better.

The core to it all, however, is that the Pirates are selling some sort of exclusive fandom to people and then want to use them as a focus group.  Which all sounds kind of weird.  I mean, maybe other teams go to their season ticket holders for feedback and things, but I’m not sure any other team does this kind of thing so explicitly.

If it were me: I’d just constantly harass the Pirates twitter feed with all of my brilliant ideas. That’s free!

(h/t to Dejan Kovacevic)

Donald Trump wants Curt Schilling in the Hall of Fame

Getty Images
7 Comments

We’ve talked a lot about Curt Schilling’s Hall of Fame candidacy over the years.

Bill has argued that, if voters are going to use the character clause to keep certain players out, they should keep Curt Schilling out. I’ve differed on that, not because I think Schilling is a good person — he’s loathsome, actually — but because I find the character clause to be illegitimate and would never, if I had a vote, use it to impact my vote. So, yes, I’d put Schilling on my ballot if I had one.

I’m not alone in this, of course. At the moment Schilling has support on about 72% of ballots which have been made public. My guess is that he’ll fall a tad short when results are announced tomorrow — non-public ballots tend to include fewer players on them — but we’ll see.

I am not the only non-BBWAA member who would vote for Schilling. He’s got some top level support too. From the President of the United States:

Ballots had to be submitted by December 31, so it’s not like this is gonna have any impact on the vote totals. If it came earlier, though, one wonders if it would. And one wonders if that’d help Schilling or hurt him.