We’ve heard a lot since Thursday evening about how Ryan Braun was such a lucky dog for beating the system and all of that. We haven’t heard a ton, however, about that system itself. But Grantland’s Charles Pierce has some pretty strong opinions. Notably:
From its very beginnings, the “war” on performance-enhancing drugs in sports, and especially in baseball, has been legally questionable, morally incoherent, and recklessly dependent on collateral damage to make its point.
Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?
Pierce fires a lot of bullets at baseball and the drug testing system. Some hit, some miss. But there’s an overarching truth to what he’s saying here that resonates with me, and that’s that Major League Baseball has always been a paternalistic and even authoritarian organization in many ways. Indeed, much of its history can be explained by people in charge making arbitrary, self-interested rules and then reacting poorly to it all when someone dares challenge them.
Much of the Ryan Braun reaction has been that way. “Who cares that the rules weren’t followed? It’s all fine, and how dare you say differently? You’re upsetting a perfectly fine apple cart here, Mr. Litigious!” It happened with segregation, free agency and collusion. In some ways it’s happening with drug testing too: this presumption that the authorities are correct and the one challenging the system is the troublemaker. Or worse.
No, this isn’t to make an equivalency between drug testing system and things like segregation and collusion. Those latter things were awful and drug testing’s aims are noble. But they are similar in terms of how someone challenging the system makes the establishment downright indignant. And I think that says something fairly revealing about the culture of baseball.