As expected, the Mariners have released Jack Cust after designating him for assignment last week.
Cust is owed another $1 million for so as part of a one-year, $2.5 million contract, so predictably none of the other 29 teams wanted to take on that salary after he hit just .213 with three homers and a .673 OPS in 67 games for the Mariners.
Cust was once an underrated hitter, providing good value despite low batting averages and high strikeout totals because he drew tons of walks, got on base at a strong clip, and hit 25-30 homers. However, his power has vanished in the past two years.
He might still be a useful left-handed bench bat for teams that miss out on picking up, say, Jason Giambi before the August 31 waiver trade deadline, but Cust’s lack of defensive skills make him a pretty marginal player if he’s not hitting for power to go along with all the walks.
We’ve talked a lot about Curt Schilling’s Hall of Fame candidacy over the years.
Bill has argued that, if voters are going to use the character clause to keep certain players out, they should keep Curt Schilling out. I’ve differed on that, not because I think Schilling is a good person — he’s loathsome, actually — but because I find the character clause to be illegitimate and would never, if I had a vote, use it to impact my vote. So, yes, I’d put Schilling on my ballot if I had one.
I’m not alone in this, of course. At the moment Schilling has support on about 72% of ballots which have been made public. My guess is that he’ll fall a tad short when results are announced tomorrow — non-public ballots tend to include fewer players on them — but we’ll see.
I am not the only non-BBWAA member who would vote for Schilling. He’s got some top level support too. From the President of the United States:
Ballots had to be submitted by December 31, so it’s not like this is gonna have any impact on the vote totals. If it came earlier, though, one wonders if it would. And one wonders if that’d help Schilling or hurt him.