Rafael Palmeiro: “voters are putting too much weight on the one incident”

24 Comments

Mel Antonen caught up with Rafael Palmeiro today after the Hall of Fame vote was announced. Palmeiro is understandable disappointed with his vote total. After saying some nice things about Roberto Alomar and saying that he thought he himself would get more support than he did, Palmeiro made an appeal to the voters:

“I hear some voters talk about how they’ll probably vote for Barry Bonds because he was a Hall of Famer before he (allegedly) took steroids. Well, why can’t they do the same thing for me? I had one bad mistake at the end of my career. Voters are putting too much weight on the one incident. I wish they would look at my whole career. If they want, why don’t they use throw out the last season of my career? I would still have Hall of Fame numbers.”

I’m actually kinda skeptical that Bonds will get in the Hall any time soon after he first becomes eligible.  The voters drew a line in the sand today: if you’re merely suspected of ‘roiding, less than half of them will vote for you.  If you were ever caught, you’re getting less than 20% of the vote.  Bonds didn’t test positive, but there’s a mountain of evidence against him and I predict that he’ll be in Mark McGwireland when he comes up for a vote.  Maybe 30%, because he was so darn good, but not much more.

As for Palmeiro: good luck thinking that people will change their minds on you, but they won’t.

Mike Trout has been really good at baseball lately

Getty Images
Leave a comment

“Water wet,” “Sky blue,” “Dog bites man” and “Mike Trout good” are not exactly newsworthy sentiments, but once in a while you have to state the obvious just so you can look back later and make sure you were, in the moment, aware of the obvious.

And to be fair, “Mike Trout good” is underselling the Angels outfielder lately. He’s on the greatest tear of his great career lately, and dang it, that’s worthy of a few words on this blog.

Last night Trout went a mere 1-for-1, but that’s because the Diamondbacks were smart enough not to pitch to him too much, walking him twice. There was no one on base the first time he came up and he got a free pass. There was a guy on first but two outs the second time, so he was once again not given much to hit and took his base again. Arizona was not so lucky the third time. The bases were loaded and there was nowhere to put Trout. He smacked the first pitch he saw for a two-run single. They probably shoulda just walked him anyway, limiting the damage to one. The last time up he reached on catcher’s interference. Maybe Arizona figured that literally grabbing the bat from him with a catcher’s mitt was the best bet?

If so you can’t blame them, really. Not with the month he’s had. In June, Trout is hitting .448/.554/.776 with five homers. He currently leads the league in the following categories: home runs (23), runs (60), walks (64), on-base percentage (.469), OPS (1.158) OPS+ (219), total bases (179) and intentional walks (9). He currently has a bWAR of 6.5. WAR, in case you did not know, is a cumulative stat. When he won the 2014 MVP Award, he “only” had 7.6 for the entire year.

Sadly, one man does not a team make, so the Angels are only 9-8 in the month of June and have fallen far back of the red-hot Houston Astros and Seattle Mariners in the division race. For this reason I suspect a lot of people are going to do what they’ve long done and overlook Mike Trout’s sheer dominance or, even more ridiculously, claim he is overrated or something (believe me, I’ve seen it even this month).

Feel free to ignore those people and concentrate instead on the greatest baseball player in the game today, who has somehow managed to up his game in recent weeks.