There’s not much more to this than that statement itself, which Ken Rosenthal passed along a few minutes ago. It’s kind of hard to analyze such a rumor in the manner we normally do, however, because (a) all teams should have a strong interest in Upton, so Toronto’s would not be surprising; and (b) Justin Upton is so good that the usual “where would he fit” analysis is rather silly. He fits anywhere, and if he doesn’t, you make room.
The Jays have a lot of pitching, but they’ve learned more than anyone else in recent years that you can never have too much pitching given that, you know, pitchers get hurt.
Beyond that, Upton in Toronto would be more intriguing than Upton in a lot of places, because he truly could help turn the AL East into a four-team cluster if he joined the Jays.
We’ve talked a lot about Curt Schilling’s Hall of Fame candidacy over the years.
Bill has argued that, if voters are going to use the character clause to keep certain players out, they should keep Curt Schilling out. I’ve differed on that, not because I think Schilling is a good person — he’s loathsome, actually — but because I find the character clause to be illegitimate and would never, if I had a vote, use it to impact my vote. So, yes, I’d put Schilling on my ballot if I had one.
I’m not alone in this, of course. At the moment Schilling has support on about 72% of ballots which have been made public. My guess is that he’ll fall a tad short when results are announced tomorrow — non-public ballots tend to include fewer players on them — but we’ll see.
I am not the only non-BBWAA member who would vote for Schilling. He’s got some top level support too. From the President of the United States:
Ballots had to be submitted by December 31, so it’s not like this is gonna have any impact on the vote totals. If it came earlier, though, one wonders if it would. And one wonders if that’d help Schilling or hurt him.