Fake trade: Dan Uggla to Rays for B.J. Upton, Jason Bartlett

4 Comments

The following scenario is completely hypothetical and should not be taken as an actual rumor, much less a completed deal.

Rays acquire second baseman Dan Uggla from the Marlins for outfielder B.J. Upton and shortstop Jason Bartlett.

Why it works for Tampa Bay: The Rays finished third in the AL in runs scored last season, but the team was sixth in homers and eighth in slugging percentage.   With Carl Crawford and Carlos Pena both potentially leaving in free agency, the team needs to add some power and Uggla hit five more homers last season than anyone on the Rays.  He has four straight 30-homer seasons to his credit.  Top prospect Desmond Jennings and Reid Brignac can replace Upton and Bartlett, respectively.

Why it works for Florida: The Marlins don’t need to save money in an Uggla deal.  In all likelihood, they’d get trouble in with the MLBPA again if they didn’t spend Uggla’s money elsewhere.  Upton and Bartlett combined to make $7 million last year, while Uggla came in at $7.8 million.  Both newcomers would be due raises in arbitration, but not major ones after down years.  Upton would give the team a high-upside center fielder to replace the one they just parted with Saturday.  Bartlett could step in at second base for a year and potentially provide a big upgrade on defense.

Why it won’t happen: While I like the idea of Upton for Florida, Bartlett probably isn’t worth his $4 million-$5 million salary, particularly if he’s not playing shortstop.   The deal would look a lot better for the Marlins with Brignac included instead, but that’d be too much for the Rays to give up for one year of Uggla, particuarly when Uggla is going to making $10 millon-$12 million and eating up a good portion of the team’s financial flexibility.

Donald Trump wants Curt Schilling in the Hall of Fame

Getty Images
6 Comments

We’ve talked a lot about Curt Schilling’s Hall of Fame candidacy over the years.

Bill has argued that, if voters are going to use the character clause to keep certain players out, they should keep Curt Schilling out. I’ve differed on that, not because I think Schilling is a good person — he’s loathsome, actually — but because I find the character clause to be illegitimate and would never, if I had a vote, use it to impact my vote. So, yes, I’d put Schilling on my ballot if I had one.

I’m not alone in this, of course. At the moment Schilling has support on about 72% of ballots which have been made public. My guess is that he’ll fall a tad short when results are announced tomorrow — non-public ballots tend to include fewer players on them — but we’ll see.

I am not the only non-BBWAA member who would vote for Schilling. He’s got some top level support too. From the President of the United States:

Ballots had to be submitted by December 31, so it’s not like this is gonna have any impact on the vote totals. If it came earlier, though, one wonders if it would. And one wonders if that’d help Schilling or hurt him.