Albert Pujols won "NL player of the month" for August while the Cardinals went 11-15

20 Comments

Albert Pujols has been named the National League’s player of the month for August, and rightfully so. He hit .379 and slugged .777 during the month, smacking 11 homers and eight doubles in 103 at-bats while posting a 1.230 OPS in 26 games.
And the Cardinals went 11-15.
All of which says two things, to me at least. One is that the rest of the Cardinals are really, really struggling. That’s not exactly breaking news given that they’ve fallen eight games back of the Reds in the NL Central and are now just 69-62 overall, but the point is hammered home when they have a .423 winning percentage despite the guy in the middle of their lineup hitting like Babe Ruth (or, like Albert Pujols).
Beyond that, it can serve as yet another reminder of how silly it is to let team success factor into individual award voting at the end of the season. Pujols may not be the best player in the league when all is said and done this season because right now Joey Votto is neck and neck with him, but if Pujols is the best it would be crazy to let the Cardinals not making the playoffs keep him from another deserved MVP.
Pujols did everything he could possibly do to help the Cardinals last month and they still had a losing record. The fact that his teammates collectively stunk doesn’t make what he did any more or less valuable, and that applies to full seasons every bit as much as it does to months. I’m really looking forward to the Triple Crown race between Pujols and Votto, and the MVP voting should be interesting as well, but I’m hoping Votto doesn’t get extra credit for his teammates performing better.

Zack Cozart thinks the way the Rays have been using Sergio Romo is bad for baseball

Matthew Stockman/Getty Images
6 Comments

The Rays started Sergio Romo on back-to-back days and if that sounds weird to you, you’re not alone. Romo, of course, was the star closer for the Giants for a while, helping them win the World Series in 2012 and ’14. He’s been a full-time reliever dating back to 2006, when he was at Single-A.

In an effort to prevent lefty Ryan Yarbrough from facing the righty-heavy top of the Angels’ lineup (Zack Cozart, Mike Trout, Justin Upton), Romo started Saturday’s game, pitching the first inning before giving way to Yarbrough in the second. Romo struck out the side, in fact. The Rays went on to win 5-3.

The Rays did it again on Sunday afternoon, starting Romo. This time, he got four outs before giving way to Matt Andriese. Romo walked two without giving up a hit while striking out three. The Angels managed to win 5-2 however.

Despite Sunday’s win, Cozart wasn’t a happy camper with the way the Rays used Romo. Via Fabian Ardaya of The Athletic, Cozart said, “It was weird … It’s bad for baseball, in my opinion … It’s spring training. That’s the best way to explain it.”

It’s difficult to see merit in Cozart’s argument. It’s not like the Rays were making excessive amounts of pitching changes; they used five on Saturday and four on Sunday. The games lasted three hours and three hours, 15 minutes, respectively. The average game time is exactly three hours so far this season. I’m having trouble wondering how else Cozart might mean the strategy is bad for baseball.

It seems like the real issue is that Cozart is afraid of the sport changing around him. The Rays, like most small market teams, have to find their edges in slight ways. The Rays aren’t doing this blindly; the strategy makes sense based on their opponents’ starting lineup. The idea of valuing on-base percentage was scoffed at. Shifting was scoffed at and now every team employs them to some degree. Who knows if starting a reliever for the first three or four outs will become a trend, but it’s shortsighted to write it off at first glance.