The difference between good cheating and bad cheating

19 Comments

USA Today’s Christine Brennan on A-Rod, in a column which argues that A-Rod’s PED use should cause Major League Baseball to dock him home runs:

During those three tainted seasons in Texas, A-Rod hit
more home runs than in any other three-year period of his 17-year
career: 52 in 2001, 57 in 2002 and 47 in 2003. (Are there really still
people out there who think performance-enhancing drugs don’t affect home
run totals?)

So, the years he admitted to cheating yielded 156 home runs. From there, we can do the math: 600 minus 156 equals 444.

USA Today’s Christine Brennan on the New England Patriots’ video tape cheating scandal from a few years ago:

But no one should be surprised. There’s cheating in the NFL? That’s
news? Wouldn’t it be more newsworthy if there were no cheating in the
NFL? New England, in particular, has developed a bit of a history for
this kind of antic. Once every 25 years, the Patriots produce a head
coach who decides that he must use all the technology available to him
to win a football game.

I could not find any sentiment on Brennan’s part to deprive the Patriots of their Super Bowl titles back then.  I’m curious as to what has changed.