Buster Olney is saying the Red Sox think so:
Heard this: There
are concerns within the Boston organization about whether Jason Bay
would hold up physically through a multi-year deal.
I suppose that’s always a concern when you sign a guy to a long deal — and Alex Speier at WEEI.com is reporting that it’ll take five years to get Bay right now — but the guy hasn’t had too many health issues to date. He had some hamstring problems late in the season, but he hasn’t been on the DL in five years.
One questions whether it’s ever a good idea to give a guy in his thirties a five-year contract, but I don’t know that Bay is any greater an injury risk than anyone else. This could be something someone with the Red Sox is floating simply to pressure Bay a bit.
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: a Mets player struggles mightily for an extended period, to the point where it seems pretty obvious that something is wrong with him. The team says that he’s merely “sore” or “banged up” or something and the team either plays short-handed for a while or deals with the diminished player taking his hacks. Then, when he is eventually placed on the disabled list, it’s revealed that he has more serious trouble than general soreness or being banged up.
You ask for miracles, Theo, I give you the New York Mets:
He had been put on the DL a couple of days ago, but now it’s clear what the problem is. It may also illuminate why Bruce is hitting just .212/.292/.321 with three homers and 17 RBI in 236 plate appearances this season.
The Mets have not announced a timetable for Bruce.