Hey Phillies! Call the Dbacks!

Leave a comment

Phillies’ GM Ruben Amaro has a problem:

I talked to Amaro on the phone yesterday, and while he said that
upgrading the starting rotation remains his “main focus,” he said he
doesn’t yet have any willing trade partners. The problem, evidently, is
two-fold: a) Some of the pitchers who ordinarily would be on the market
(Jake Peavy, Erik Bedard, etc.) are injured; b) Some of the teams that
were expected to be trade-deadline sellers (Rockies, Reds, etc.)
haven’t completely dropped out of contention.

“No one’s out there dealing anybody or wanting to part with anybody
because the pitchers who are available are, one, hurt, and two,
pitching for teams that don’t think they’re out of the race yet,” Amaro
told Philled In. “I know because I’ve asked about every one of them.”

Ruben! Put Circling the Bases in your RSS feed and your problems will be solved!

Zack Cozart thinks the way the Rays have been using Sergio Romo is bad for baseball

Matthew Stockman/Getty Images
10 Comments

The Rays started Sergio Romo on back-to-back days and if that sounds weird to you, you’re not alone. Romo, of course, was the star closer for the Giants for a while, helping them win the World Series in 2012 and ’14. He’s been a full-time reliever dating back to 2006, when he was at Single-A.

In an effort to prevent lefty Ryan Yarbrough from facing the righty-heavy top of the Angels’ lineup (Zack Cozart, Mike Trout, Justin Upton), Romo started Saturday’s game, pitching the first inning before giving way to Yarbrough in the second. Romo struck out the side, in fact. The Rays went on to win 5-3.

The Rays did it again on Sunday afternoon, starting Romo. This time, he got four outs before giving way to Matt Andriese. Romo walked two without giving up a hit while striking out three. The Angels managed to win 5-2 however.

Despite Sunday’s win, Cozart wasn’t a happy camper with the way the Rays used Romo. Via Fabian Ardaya of The Athletic, Cozart said, “It was weird … It’s bad for baseball, in my opinion … It’s spring training. That’s the best way to explain it.”

It’s difficult to see merit in Cozart’s argument. It’s not like the Rays were making excessive amounts of pitching changes; they used five on Saturday and four on Sunday. The games lasted three hours and three hours, 15 minutes, respectively. The average game time is exactly three hours so far this season. I’m having trouble wondering how else Cozart might mean the strategy is bad for baseball.

It seems like the real issue is that Cozart is afraid of the sport changing around him. The Rays, like most small market teams, have to find their edges in slight ways. The Rays aren’t doing this blindly; the strategy makes sense based on their opponents’ starting lineup. The idea of valuing on-base percentage was scoffed at. Shifting was scoffed at and now every team employs them to some degree. Who knows if starting a reliever for the first three or four outs will become a trend, but it’s shortsighted to write it off at first glance.