Craig Calcaterra

Jason Heyward

2015 Winter Meetings Preview


The baseball world will descend on Nashville this weekend for the 2015 Winter Meetings. And, unlike the case in the past couple of years in which many signings and trades went down before the meetings, there is a LOT of hot stove business to attend to.

Exactly one of the top ten or so free agents have signed thus far: David Price. Still on the board and up for grabs: Zack Greinke, Jason Heyward, Chris Davis, Alex Gordon, Justin Upton, Johnny Cueto, Yoenis Cespedes, Ben Zobrist and Jeff Samardzija.

And there’s a whole second tier as well, all of whom could be big difference makers. That group includes Mike Leake, John Lackey, Ian Desmond, Howie Kendrick, Scott KazmirWei-Yin Chen, Daniel Murphy and many others. Oh, and then there’s the business of posting for Kenta Maeda, the plethora of relief pitchers, led by Darren O'Day, who tend to sign in bunches and, of course, trade possibilities we haven’t even considered.

It’s impossible to predict who will sign when — I still remember the Disney hotel bar clearing out at, like, 11pm, when Carl Crawford signed with the Sox during the 2010 Meetings — but it’s not unreasonable to assume that the starting pitching market will assume some serious clarity by this time next week. Price has, more or less, set the market, with Zack Greinke rumored to be close to deciding between the Dodgers and the Giants. After that, all of the starters should begin to fall in line.

The outfield situation is a bit more crowded and confused. One would assume that everyone is waiting for Heyward to sign, but Heyward’s youth and, well, strangeness, as a free agent may make him a special case. Strangeness in that so much of his value is defense and, unlike some of the others, it’s fair to think he has another offensive gear as well. That could make him harder to value to some front offices and harder for some owners to give the OK on what will likely have to be a big, big offer to land him. With him being a more complicated case it’s possible we’ll see the lesser/cheaper options come off the board first. Alex Gordon may not anchor your outfield for most of the next decade, but you likely won’t have to commit to him for that long either.

Outside of the transactions, we have the usual Winter Meetings business. Indeed, the vast majority of the people at the Meetings aren’t there for transactions. They’re there to network, seek jobs and discuss the business of baseball. Ever year we hear about a rule change or a proposal for future rule changes. Some tweak to the circumstances of the game be they financial or otherwise. It’s a good time for the league to break the kind of news it wants to break in a controlled fashion. Finally, there is the matter of the Hall of Fame Veterans Committee vote. Which, unlike in past years, will not result in an inductee press conference absent a seance.

So, absent a dozen signings or trades today, the stage is set for a busier-than-usual Winter Meetings. We’ll be on the scene in Nashville bringing you all the best hot stove business we have to offer and, as usual, some more fun odds and ends from baseball’s biggest offseason event.

Tony Clark says something odd about the upcoming CBA negotiations

Tony Clark

The current Collective Bargaining Agreement between the owners and the players expires after the 2016 season. One of the issues which some — notably Scott Boras — has thrown out as a possible topic of the upcoming CBA negotiations is the apparent disparity between baseball’s revenues and the share of those revenues taken by the players.

On the surface it appears that, while everyone in baseball is getting rich these days, the owners are getting far, far richer than the men who actually play the game, proportionally speaking. Indeed, those who have studied the matter or who have at least spoken out about it, including agents with skin in the game like Boras and less-agenda driven analysts like Nathaniel Grow of FanGraphs, have been in agreement that the players’ piece of the pie is shrinking.

Last spring Grow reported that since baseball’s last labor stoppage, in 1995, MLB’s revenues have increased nearly 650% (from around $1.4 billion to over $9 billion in 2014). During that same time period, however, MLB payrolls have only increased by around 378%, from roughly $925 million in 1995 to just under $3.5 billion last year. The spilt, Boras says, has gone from 60/40 in favor of the players to 57/43 in favor of the owners.

While revenue splits between owners and workers have, historically, been on the front burner of labor disputes, whether that split is actually a huge issue for the players heading into the next negotiation is unknown. Maybe they don’t care about it too much and are more concerned with other matters. But there is that history and, of course, when you negotiate it’s NEVER in your best interest to give away an issue or to claim it’s unimportant ahead of time, even if it is. Indeed, the key to winning a negotiation is to “give in” on stuff that, secretly, you don’t care as much about as your opponent thinks you do.

As such, it would make perfect sense for MLBPA Executive Director Tony Clark to claim — even if he does so only for tactical purposes — that revenue split is a concern of the union. Clark spoke with Bill Shaikin of the Los Angeles Times today, however, and he said something rather odd on the matter:

I can find no one who studies such matters who has claimed what Clark claims here regarding revenue splits. And, at least from the outside, it would be hard to come up with such wildly divergent numbers. Payroll figures and baseball revenue are more or less publicly reported. We know what each player makes and the league itself likes to crow about how much it brings in (it helps shout down the “baseball is dying, you guys” crowd too). Simple math gives us percentages, of course.

Which isn’t to say that Clark is wrong. He’s the head of the MLBPA, after all, and after Rob Manfred and some accountants one presumes that he has better information than anyone. He also doesn’t have any incentive — as owners certainly do and as owners have frequently claimed throughout history — to disingenuously understate baseball’s revenues, to portray the league as poorer than it really is or, for that matter, the players richer than they really are. Again: he’s the Executive Director of a labor union. If he did that, he’d be committing malpractice.

So what the heck is going on here?

At the moment I can’t for the life of me figure it out. One possibility that fits here is that, in reality, those $9 billion+ revenue numbers that get passed around each year are bogus and that, in reality, baseball makes far less than it claims. If that were the case, Clark wouldn’t be “crying poor” the way the owners have done in the past. He’d just be operating from financial assumptions which he can reasonably defend in a negotiation. If that’s the case, a reasonable takeaway here would be for the media to never again credulously report baseball’s revenues as reported by baseball and, further, to criticize baseball for claiming the crazy-growth it has claimed for the past 20 years.

If that’s not the case — if the $9 billion+ and the payroll figures which get reported are legit — I’m at a total loss. And utterly unable to comprehend why a union boss would downplay the size of the golden goose. A golden goose from which he has a fiduciary duty to carve a larger part for the workers he represents. Or to at least claim he wants to for purposes of negotiation.

Anyone have any ideas?

Cliff Lee cleared medically, could pitch in 2016

cliff lee getty

Jon Heyman reports that Cliff Lee has received medical clearance and is currently throwing with no issues. He says that Lee will try to pitch in 2016 if he “finds the right fit.”

Lee missed the entire 2015 season after suffering a torn flexor tendon in his throwing elbow during spring training. He only pitched 13 games in 2014 and was last effective over the course of a whole season in 2013. He’s 37 now. And, after the Phillies understandably declined his 2016 option, is a free agent.

What the “right fit” would be for Lee is unknown, but given his recent track record and health, it had better be “a minor league deal with an invite to spring training” at best, or else he won’t be pitching in 2016.