Craig Calcaterra

Diamondbacks uniforms

We need to have a conversation about the Diamondbacks’ pants


The Diamondbacks introduced new uniforms back. We talked a lot about them here. The upshot: lots of bold designs and interesting new concepts, the likes of which we haven’t seen in baseball before.

The most interesting aspect of them are the dotted “snakeskin” patterns around the shoulders, the bottom of the pants, and on some of the caps. It’s definitely different. And, I suppose, kinda cool depending on how you feel about the whole “tradition” thing.

But it’s also a bit unsettling in the wild. Steve Gilbert tweeted this pic from Salt River Fields this morning. Notice anything?


If not, maybe this will help:


Yeah, it pretty much looks like the Diamondbacks just waded through the killing floor of a slaughterhouse. You’re not going to be able to unsee that all season, folks. Maybe you can live with it as some sort of metaphorical thing. Like, say, if the Dbacks are dominant this year you can picture a trail of dead enemies or something. Mostly, though, I’m just gonna try to look up. I’m rather squeamish.

Aroldis Chapman says he’ll appeal any suspension under the domestic violence policy

Aroldis Chapman

As most are aware, Yankees reliever Aroldis Chapman was alleged to have pushed and choked his girlfriend in his home on October 30 before firing off at least eight gunshots in his garage. He was not arrested on that night, however, and no charges were filed. From a law enforcement perspective, the matter is over.

Major League Baseball, however, has made it clear that their new domestic violence policy sets forth a higher standard than that set by law enforcement and it has entered into an agreement with its employees which allows it to impose discipline arising out of domestic violence situations even if the employee is not charged with a crime. To that end, the league continues to investigate the Chapman case and may very well suspend Chapman.

Today, as pitchers and catchers reported to spring training in Tampa, Chapman was asked about the situation and he said he will appeal if he is suspended under MLB’s new domestic violence policy, as is his right. If and when that happens, it will be a really big deal for Major League Baseball, Chapman and the new domestic violence policy.

Chapman was not the first player to have been involved in a domestic violence incident after the policy was enacted. Jose Reyes was. But given that Reyes’ case is going to trial, MLB may wait longer to impose discipline on him. That could mean that Chapman will be the first and, as the first, his case will take on tremendous significance.

The policy sets forth no minimum or maximum penalty. Rather, Rob Manfred must issue the discipline “he believes is appropriate in light of the severity of the conduct.” He is unshackled by anything other than his conscience. The discipline he imposes on Chapman, if any, will set a precedent by which all future domestic violence incidents are judged. There will be obvious adjustments for the facts and circumstances of each case, but Chapman is setting the bogey. Likewise, Chapman’s appeal will set the precedent for the breadth of Manfred’s discretion and will signal to all players whether a vigorous appeal and all that entails makes sense.

This is a big, big moment for Rob Manfred. Punish Chapman heavily in order to send a message and an arbitration panel could undercut him. Punish Chapman too lightly and he runs the risk of appearing to be soft on domestic violence. All of this is magnified by the fact that Chapman is a superstar player on the league’s marquee franchise and it will covered by more reporters than you can shake a stick at.

My guess would be that Manfred goes heavy, anticipating that a panel may back some time off of the suspension, leaving Chapman with a sentence the league can live with. But we really don’t know. I wonder if even Manfred knows what he’ll do yet.

The anniversary of the Simpsons’ “Homer at the Bat” is approaching

Screen Shot 2016-02-18 at 10.44.22 AM

I would hope that every baseball fan is aware of the “Homer at the Bat” episode of “The Simpsons.” It’s possible, of course, that some people aren’t either because (a) February 20, 1992, when it originally aired, was ancient history for them (or pre-history for them); or (b) they just don’t like “The Simpsons.” Both of those possibilities are kind of terrifying to consider, but I’ll grant that they are, in fact, possibilities.

If you are one of those people, know that “Homer at the Bat” was an episode which featured a ton of actual Major League Baseball player cameos. Roger Clemens, Wade Boggs, Ken Griffey, Jr., Steve Sax, Ozzie Smith, Jose Canseco, Don Mattingly, Darryl Strawberry and Mike Scioscia all guest starred as themselves, assembled by Mr. Burns in order to create a ringer softball team. Calamity strikes, however, zaniness ensues, etc. etc. and 24 years later it’s a classic. A couple of years ago, Erik Malinowski wrote a history of the episode over at Deadspin, and it’s must-read material for both hardcore “Simpsons” fans and anyone with affection for baseball players of the 80s and early 90s.

There have been all manner of other remembrances of it as well, and they never get old in my view. And now there will be a new one this Saturday as SiriusXM’s MLB Network Radio channel will host a special edition of its “Hot Stove” show that will celebrate “Homer at the Bat.” It will be on from 1:00 to 4:00 pm eastern and will feature three of the episode’s stars: Steve Sax, who is now a SiriusXM host as well as Ozzie Smith and Wade Boggs.

I’ll be curious to know if his thoughts about Pitt the Elder have changed.