Author: Craig Calcaterra

Andrew Friedman AP

Andrew Friedman leaving the Rays to take over as Dodgers President of Baseball Operations


The Dodgers have a new President of Baseball Operations:

Ken Rosenthal reports that Ned Colletti has not been fired but, rather, will stay with the Dodgers as a senior advisor.

UPDATE: The Dodgers have made it official:

This is a major move for the Dodgers and a big, big move for Friedman himself. Long considered one of the game’s better general managers for his ability to do so much with such a low payroll with Tampa Bay, he now goes to the team with the highest payroll in baseball. He will presumably serve the same role for the Dodgers that Theo Epstein serves in Chicago, and will thus hire a general manager beneath him to be Jed Hoyer-west.

Also of note, at least potentially: Friedman’s background is not as a baseball lifer. Rather, he was an analyst for Bear Stearns before joining the Rays and is known for having a sharp analytical perspective. The last time the Dodgers had a young head of baseball ops with an analytical bent it was Paul DePodesta, who the local press decided they hated almost immediately, criticizing him in the dumbest, most stereotypical ways possible. It’ll be interesting to see if they take that tack once again. Or if, alternatively, the combination of the passage of time and the fact that Colletti staying around will cause them to actually give Friedman a chance.

Quit making a big deal out of anomalies. Most of what happens is meaningless.

Screen Shot 2014-10-14 at 12.29.13 PM

This comes from an article that is more about the JFK assassination and attendant conspiracy theories than anything else, and no, there isn’t anything about sports in it at all. But it’s still really, really useful for sports fans because it reminds us of something really important: weird things happen sometimes, but they don’t usually mean anything.

The author, Steven Novella, is talking about anomalies, which is a more scientific term for “weird things,” but you know what I mean. And the point he makes, via examples like the dude with the umbrella at Dealey Plaza when Kennedy was shot and people who win the lottery twice, is that it’s a bad idea to try to assign meaning to stuff that is probably just random and ultimately meaningless, statistical noise.

He boils it down to a pithy quote that I am considering putting on a motivational poster, perhaps featuring a breaching whale or a guy climbing a rock in Yosemite or something:

The assumption that anomalies must be significant rather than random is an error in the understanding of statistics, a form of innumeracy.

This relates to baseball quite a bit, especially during the playoffs.

We have this habit — among some it’s practically a need — to assign significance to random or anomalous events. Ned Yost has a few ill-advised bunts work out for him? SMALL BALL IS THE NEW HOTNESS! Dominant players like Clayton Kershaw and Mike Trout struggle in the space of 2-3 games? THEY DON’T HAVE WHAT IT TAKES TO WIN IN OCTOBER! A scrappy middle infielder hits an improbable home run? EVERYONE UNDERESTIMATES SCRAPPY McSCRAPPERSTEIN, and HOW DARE YOU DISMISS HIM! We’ve seen this stuff time and time again.

Which isn’t to say that the anomalies aren’t worth talking about. Man, they are! They’re fun! When Ryan Vogelsong turns into Orel Hershiser in the playoffs or when Scrapy McScrapperstein turns into a one man wrecking crew it’s exciting. We should talk about that a lot because it shows you how amazing and cool sports can be and that no matter how much you read and consume, you’re never really going to be able to predict what happens. At least not everything.

But what we shouldn’t do is assign some deeper meaning to these anomalies. To not be content to say that the squeeze play was exciting, but that everyone who ever criticized such strategies is wrong. To not just marvel at how cool Scrappy McScrapperstein’s surprising homer was, but to claim it evidence that he’s way, way better than eight years worth of performance suggests. To not just shake our heads when a beast like Clayton Kershaw gets lit up, but to suggest that it’s some defect in his guts or character than led to it.

That kind of thing is baloney. That’s a function of that innumeracy Novella is talking about. Of our brains trying to find meaning when there really isn’t any. Sometimes — most of the time, I’d argue — the meaningless of it all is what makes baseball so great.

It’s unclear if Kenta Maeda will be posted this year

kenta maeda getty

Japanese pitcher Kenta Maeda is considered a top candidate to be posted by his team, the Hiroshima Carp, this winter. At the moment, however, Hiroshima’s owner is going back and forth on the idea, telling the Japan Times that “We would like to let him go, but based on his production this year it will be difficult.”

Maeda, 26, had a 2.56 ERA and a 154/40 K/BB ratio in 179 innings this season for the Hiroshima Carp. He is not the hardest thrower around — low 90s is where he tops out — but he profiles as a back-of-the-rotation starter at the moment.


Must-click Link: Fay Vincent, the wisest failure you’ll ever meet

Texas Rangers

Fox’ Erik Malinowski sat down with former commissioner Fay Vincent recently, and the result is probably the best profile of Vincent ever done. And one which says way more about baseball and how it’s run than it may say about Vincent. It’s absolute must-read material.

The first half is about the 1989 World Series and the earthquake which interrupted it. Vincent’s response and what went into the immediate aftermath (evacuating Candlestick Park and getting to a hotel with no water and no power). The highlight of that part is a positively fabulous George Steinbrenner anecdote which pretty much captures everything you ever needed to know about what Steinbrenner was like before the Yankees started winning in the late 90s and his persona and reputation began to undergo something of a rehabilitation.

The second half is about his tenure as commissioner in general and his ultimate downfall after being pushed aside by Bud Selig and the other owners. This stuff is highly illuminating as to how baseball ownership works and how, in reality, the commissioner never really was the leader of baseball as much as he was the water-carrier for the owners. Vincent either didn’t realize that or forgot it, and his description of how he met his professional end makes you realize just how silly it is for people to demand a strong commissioner who dictates anything to anyone. Selig’s strength came from being an owner and knowing where his power came from. Rob Manfred’s tenure will be dictated by either realizing, or failing to realize, the same thing.

Ultimately, though, what makes this all so intriguing is how frank and honest Vincent is about his legacy. Unlike so many deposed leaders, Vincent admits that he failed and knows why he did. He says so in frank terms multiple times. Maybe it’s taken him over 20 years to realize all of this, maybe it’s something he even knew while it was happening. But the clarity that the now-76-year-old Vincent has about his tenure as commissioner is pretty striking.

Beyond all of that, great anecdotes about George W. Bush — who seems way too reasonable a guy to ever have been a baseball owner — and Bart Giamatti, Vincent’s friend and predecessor. People often talk about what may have happened had Giamatti lived and whether he could’ve prevented the 1994 strike. Vincent, with love, points out that it would’ve ended no differently and, possibly, it may have ended worse.

Clear your schedule and check this piece out.