Author: Craig Calcaterra

brandon moss getty

UPDATE: Brandon Moss traded to the Indians

54 Comments

UPDATE: Jeff Passan reports that the deal is done. Moss has been traded from the A’s to the Indians for infielder Joe Wendle. Who turns 25 in April, has never been above Double-A and is already a 2B/DH, which doesn’t bode well for his long term chances, but there you go.

12:21 PM: It was big talk for a few days, then sort of died, but Buster Olney says that a trade between the Indians and the A’s involving Brandon Moss is “on the verge: of going down.

The A’s are reportedly targeting a young middle infielder in the deal, and if the Indians get Moss, you have to figure that Nick Swisher’s days in Cleveland are over.

Madison Bumgarner is Sports Illustrated’s Sportsman of the Year

Madison Bumgarner
78 Comments

SAN DIEGO — Maybe it just shows my age that I still think SI’s Sportsman of the Year Award means something. It certainly felt important once, back when Sports Illustrated was the gold standard of sports media. It’s not that anymore — media is so fragmented now — but it still feels like a big deal to this 41-year-old scribe.

And it means more to me when a baseball player wins it too, likely as some weird defensive feeling about baseball and its standing in the world. It’s like how you feel when they mention your hometown on the local news, maybe.

Anyway, Madison Bumgarner — hero of the World Series — is this year’s Sportsman of the Year. And the cover featuring him is pretty spiffy:

source:

 

Man, they really need to mow the grass at AT&T Park.

Taking a closer look at the Hall of Fame Veterans Committee candidates

Dick Allen
36 Comments

SAN DIEGO — It may leak before then, but at 2pm Eastern time today, the official announcement of which of the ten nominees before the Hall of Fame Veteran’s Committee will be inducted goes down. The nominees represent the so-called “Golden Era,” which is a designation worthy of about 5,000 angry words in and of itself, but let us save that for another occasion. For now, let’s look at the nominees and consider their worthiness:

Dick Allen: National League Rookie of the Year in 1964 and the 1972 AL MVP, Allen was a feared slugger who, at his peak, was every bit the equal of any number of Hall of Famers. His prime came at a time, however, where his excellent on-base percentage was not as appreciated as it would be today and, of course, he was a famously prickly personality who made no friends in the media or in baseball’s front offices. On the baseball side, his past Hall of Fame chances fell short due to his case being all peak, really. He played “only” 15 seasons and never amassed the kind of counting stats you tend to see in Hall of Famers, finishing with 351 homers and fewer than 2,000 hits.

Ken Boyer: The 1964 NL MVP and one of the best defensive third basemen of his era. Another guy with a tad of a short career by Hall of Fame standards, he was 24 before making the bigs and was basically done as an everyday player at 35. His 282 home runs sticks in many people’s mind as too light a total for a Hall of Fame third baseman, but then again, there is no position more maligned and underrepresented in the Hall of Fame process than third base.

Gil Hodges: Maybe the most argued over and talked about Hall of Fame case in living memory. If you’re from the New York area and you’re over, say, 50, you tend to have very strong opinions about the awful, awful people who have slighted Hodges over the years and likely believe they should be imprisoned. If not, he’s the ultimate borderline candidate. And his case is a hard one. As a player alone it’s hard to make the case as, yes, he was a notable power-hitting first baseman, but he was also frequently the fourth or fifth player on his own team. His managerial exploits, however, add to his case — he helmed the Miracle Mets of 1969, of course — and his tragic early death at age 47 in 1972 colors his case with no small amount of emotion, and justifiably so. If he’s elected, expect an awful lot of joy among people who remember the Brooklyn Dodgers and the old Mets teams.

Bob Howsam: The executive who built the Big Red Machine in Cincinnati which, man, is more than just about anyone else has done. Really, you build that team today and they’re erecting statues of you all over the place. I was surprised to learn he wasn’t in the Hall of Fame already, frankly. One wonders if him being overlooked in the past has anything to do with his effort, in the late 50s, to build a third major league — the Continental League — which was aimed at exploiting untapped demand for baseball west of the Mississippi and which, eventually, led to the expansion of the early 1960s. Maybe some old dudes held a grudge over that? Old baseball dudes often held grudges about smart guys who were ahead of their time.

Jim Kaat: Maybe the best defensive pitcher of all time. That’s not something people think about too much — pitcher defense — but if you’re the best at something you’re the best. Also: Katt pitched FOREVER. Twenty-five years, in fact, amassing 283 wins. Or, if you will, “compiling” them, which is usually the case made against Kaat. He had a 25-win season in 1966, but even then at his best he was not a dominant pitcher, and that often hurts guys in the Hall of Fame game. However, the word “compiling” should not be an epithet as longevity, health and reliability has real value in baseball, especially among pitchers. It’s just that we have yet to really appreciate that over the course of careers as much as we do during the course of a single season or too.

Minnie Minoso: One of the best players of the 50s and the first notable Cuban player after baseball’s color line fell (there were many light-skinned Cuban and other Latin players who played before then, but they “passed” as white, which is a whole ‘nother conversation). Minoso had a fun power and speed mix, was a a beloved player on some fun White Sox teams and then, later, came out of retirement for some gimmick at bats in 1976 and 1980, making him — technically speaking — the only guy to hit in the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s, if you care about such things.

Tony Oliva: Dick Allen’s Rookie of the Year counterpart in the AL in 1964 and the winner of three batting titles. While Allen had an excellent but under-appreciated on-base percentage, Oliva’s value came via the perhaps over-appreciated batting average and, as such, has been someone many, many people have considered to be a Hall of Fame oversight for years. Like Allen and Boyer, his career was relatively short. Unlike those two, however, it’s hard to look at him and say that, even for a little while, he was one of the best in the game while he played.

Billy Pierce: A two-time 20-game winner. His best season came a year before the Cy Young Award was elected. If it happened today, it’d be like a Felix Hernandez-level Cy Young argument too, as he had “only” 15 wins but posted a staggering 1.97 ERA which, adjusted for era, was more impressive than Clayton Kershaw’s 2014 ERA (Pierce’s ERA+ was 200, Kershaw’s was 197). He never had the sort of support around him that a lot of other Hall of Fame pitchers had, as he pitched for the White Sox during his best years. But if he was on a lot of other teams he would’ve been in Cooperstown years ago.

Luis Tiant: A four-time 20-game winner, an amazing character. He was also a 20-game loser once, too, a year after winning 20. Which is to say the dude was erratic. At his best, an easy Hall of Famer, but that worse made for an overall career that is borderline.

Maury Wills: There was a time, probably in the late 60s and early 70s, where a lot of people probably thought of Wills as a sure Hall of Famer. He was an amazing bunter and a base stealer when no one stole bases and really helped usher in a new era in the game. But he wasn’t actually a great base-stealer — he was caught stealing a lot — and the rest of his game was not terribly remarkable. Also hurting him was that he didn’t make the bigs until he was 26, and was gone after 14 seasons. His stormy and, frankly, insane stint as the Mariners manager in 1980-81 didn’t help matters.

If I had to choose, I’d put Allen, Boyer, Howsam and Minoso in the Hall. Maybe Pierce too. I have this feeling however that we’ll see Hodges, Oliva and Hoswam make it in.

We’ll know at 2pm.

What to watch for at the 2014 Winter Meetings

Grand Hyatt
38 Comments

SAN DIEGO — Greetings from beautiful southern California. Where the weather is gorgeous and the speculation about free agents and trade possibilities is endless. It’s the Winter Meetings, baseball’s annual transaction frenzy, where owners, GMs, agents and everyone else in and around the game assemble and make the moves which set the groundwork for the coming year. This year the work is being done at the Manchester Grand Hyatt In San Diego, and it is from here I will be writing all week to keep you in the loop.

This year’s Winter Meetings are shaping up to be very different from last year’s when, it seemed anyway, all of the big deals happened before the Winter Meetings got underway. Robinson Cano signed with Seattle in the runup to it all. As did  Carlos Beltran, Joe Nathan, Jacoby Ellsbury, Jarrod Saltalamacchia, A.J. Pierzynski, Paul Konerko, Justin Morneau, Scott Kazmir and Ryan Vogelsong. Indeed, it seemed like most of the big names were off the board before everyone even made it to Orlando in 2013. But this year it is a different story indeed, with all manner of players still available.

On the market:

STARTING PITCHING

We still await Jon Lester’s decision. He, reportedly, has offers in hand from the Cubs and Red Sox and possibly the Dodgers and Giants. The deal he ultimately accepts could be around $150 million, but for now, he is leaving everyone guessing and the rest of the pitching market is likely waiting for him to make a choice before it all falls into line. Once he does, expect the market for Max Scherzer to heat up as well as the trade market for any number of other starting pitchers, any of whom could go to teams which fell short of Lester. Included in this group could be Jordan Zimmermann and Doug Fister, Rick Porcello, Jeff Samardzija and any of the Reds’ many pitchers reportedly on the market.

BATS

Yoenis Cespedes, Justin Upton and Matt Kemp are the big bats on the block. If the Dodgers can’t move Kemp they may try to trade Andre Ethier and/or Carl Crawford. Jay Bruce of the Reds and free agent Melky Cabrera each own some big bats which are also in demand, the former via trade and the latter via free agency.

RELIEVERS

David Robertson is the biggest name reliever left, though his market is hard to define. The Yankees may welcome him back, but probably not at the salary he’s expecting given that they signed Andrew Miller already. The Astros — who actually outbid the Yankees for Miller, only to see him choose New York — are a possibility. Other free agent relievers include Sergio Romo, Pat Neshek, Joba Chamberlain, Rafael Soriano and Francisco Rodriguez. Jonathan Papelbon is being shopped by the Phillies and, given their rebuild, the Braves could dangle Craig Kimbrel as well.

HALL OF FAME

Beyond the free agents, trade targets and rumor news, there is some other business to be attended to at the Winter Meetings. Most notably today, when the Veterans Committee announces which of the Golden Age candidates it has voted into the Hall of Fame. The candidates: Dick Allen, Ken Boyer, Gil Hodges, Bob Howsam, Jim Kaat, Minnie Minoso, Tony Oliva, Billy Pierce, Luis Tiant and Maury Wills. If I had to guess I’d say that Howsam — the executive who built the Cincinnati Reds of the 1970s — Hodges and Oliva get voted in, but really it’s anyone’s guess. Dick Allen and Minnie Minoso are certainly deserving of a plaque in Cooperstown, but whether they get there or not is an open question.

But really, we can preview until the cows come home but every year there are some surprises at the Winter Meetings. Follow us at HardballTalk all week to keep abreast of what is going on at baseball’s biggest offseason event.

The Diamondbacks are going to give Yasmany Tomas a chance to win the third base job

yasmany tomas getty
19 Comments

This is . . . interesting:

What makes it interesting is this:

I guess it’s worth a try. In an era when offense is so hard to come by, trying to squeeze some more of it in at the expense of defense is not entirely crazy. But really, everything I’ve read about the guy suggests that the outfield may be tough enough for him long term, so this sort of sounds like optimistic offseason talk.