Craig Calcaterra

Screen Shot 2016-03-08 at 12.05.20 PM

Meet the kid who almost got clocked in the face with that flying bat


Yesterday we shared the pics of that kid at the Braves-Pirates game who almost got hit in the face with a flying bat. Today we learn who he is and who the man was who saved him.

It’s a father and son, of course: the son is Landon Cunningham, his father is Shaun. Landon is 9 and that was his first professional baseball game ever. While a lot of people made negative comments about him having his phone in front of him, he was sending pics of the game to his mom and sister. He was understandably excited. Send your derision elsewhere, please.

Today Landon and Shaun were on the “Today” show. Watch:


The Mariners are seeking to make the opposition “uncomfortable”

Seattle Mariners' Brad Miller steals third base during the sixth inning of a baseball game against the Detroit Tigers, Wednesday, July 8, 2015, in Seattle. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Associated Press

Every year you hear a manager (or six) talking about how, this year, unlike in the past, his team is really going to be aggressive on the base paths. It’s more of a cliche than Best Shape of His Life, really. Everyone says they’re going to run more, pressure the other team more and take extra bases but once the season starts it’s the same old stuff. No one really runs anymore. Even now, in this allegedly speed-and-defense intensive era, actual base stealing is near historic lows. It’s all talk.

But at least the talk is getting more colorful! Mariners manager Scott Servais spoke with Larry Stone of the Seattle Times and characterized the Mariners’ alleged plan to run more in far more vivid terms than I can recall. The Mariners are talking about “creating some havoc,” to use Servais’ words. He said “A couple of our coaches said, ‘Let’s be uncomfortable.’ Let’s make them uncomfortable. Let’s be uncomfortable to play against.”

This reminds me of tech companies and the strategy of “disruption” or disruptive innovation. It’s an interesting concept. It’s not about innovating in some linear fashion or making things simply better or faster or cheaper. It’s about changing the game in some fundamental way which — and this is important — existing competitors can’t easily ape. Taking advantage of some previously unseen inefficiency in a market to which others simply cannot quickly adapt and which changes the competitive structure.

“Disruption,” however, is one of the most overused words in business and technology. It’s a branding strategy more than an actual business strategy. It’s a term which appears all over the social media profiles of marketing people and consultants but a concept that, in reality, is actually pretty rare in practice. The same goes for baseball and aggressive running games. Everyone talks about it all the time. Occasionally someone does it, like the Royals I suppose. But as we’ve noted here in the past, the story of the Royals isn’t so much a “disruptive” strategy as it’s “having a lot of really good baseball players.”

Which brings us back to the Mariners. I’m not sure that a team with mediocre players simply running more can be disruptive or, to use Servais’ words, “create havoc” or make the opposition “uncomfortable.” All the opposition has to do is keep an eye out for it and, using its superior personnel, stop ’em. Unlike in technology, the only way to really make baseball teams which have been in this business for 150 years “uncomfortable” is to put better players than they have on the field. The Mariners haven’t done that yet. They aren’t disrupting anything.

A.J. Hinch gets a new deal from the Astros

Houston Astros manager A.J. Hinch during the first full-squad workouts at the Astros spring training in Kissimmee, Fla., Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2016. (Karen Warren/Houston Chronicle via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT

Evan Drellich of the Houston Chronicle reports that Astros manager A.J. Hinch has gotten his contract reworked by ownership. The details aren’t known and the Astros aren’t saying, but everything in the story suggests that Hinch is getting more money, more years and/or more security in some respects.

Which makes some sense. When Hinch was hired he was not exactly the hottest commodity in managing history. His one previous stint, in Arizona, was kind of a disaster. While he was well thought of in front offices, he was not an obvious choice for a lot of teams. He did make sense for the Astros who were putting together a young team (Hinch’s problems in Arizona was in dealing with veterans) and had a front office who appreciated Hinch’s overall approach.

All that together meant that, in all likelihood, Hinch’s contract wasn’t a top-10 kind of deal. And, even if it’s not that kind of deal now, his success in Houston and the effusiveness his players have for his leadership justified a raise and/or some more security. Now he has it.