Author: Craig Calcaterra

Yankees logo

For the 100th time, the Yankees are not for sale


Earlier this week Mike Lupica — I know, whatever — said that he was convinced that the Steinbrenner family was going to sell the Yankees and chalked up the team’s failure to sign Max Scherzer as evidence of that. The idea: no more big albatross contracts so as to make the team a more desirable commodity.

The New York Post asked Hal Steinbrenner about that yesterday. He was unequivocal in denying it:

“The family is not selling the team. We have no intentions of selling the team. You can quote me on that. I am not sure why everyone continues to ask that. The Steinbrenner family is not selling a majority stake in the New York Yankees. We are not going anywhere.”

He’s used to answering that question, of course. You’ll recall a couple of years ago that ESPN New York wrote a series of articles arguing that the sale of the Yankees was imminent. This despite multiple denials from Steinbrenner.

I guess it’s just good sport to assume otherwise. Or, rather, it’s a function of Yankees reporters who are still mentally wired to think that all baseball teams should be run like George Steinbrenner ran the Yankees and, when they see activity that doesn’t comport with what went on in back in the good old days, such as they were — things like passing on what could be a bad contract for a pitcher over 30 or behavior that is somewhat less insane than that which The Boss tended to exhibit — they interpret it as lack of interest or passion for the team.

If the Steinbrenners do see the Yankees as just a part of their family’s assets and business empire then, yes, it would make sense that they think about selling the team from time to time, especially given how crazy-high franchise values have gone. The bubble has never really popped on those values and they may defy logic and continue to rise. It’s something to consider and smart business people should consider that sort of thing from time to time. But if they view it as the family business and enjoy owning the New York Yankees — and there is nothing which strongly suggests otherwise — these things won’t matter too much.

I’ll believe the Yankees are for sale the moment Hal Steinbrenner or a spokesman says they’re for sale. And not a moment before.

Blue Jays outfielder Michael Saunders tore a meniscus in his knee, is out until the All-Star Break

Michael Saunders

Bad news from the first week of Blue Jays camp in Dunedin. Shi Davidi reports that their newly-acquired outfielder Michael Saunders stepped on a soft spot of ground near an underground sprinkler yesterday, his knee buckled and he tore a meniscus. He’ll require surgery and will be out until at last the All-Star Break.

Saunders was acquired from Seattle back in December for J.A. Happ. He has battled injury at times, but he has a 111 OPS+ since the beginning of the 2012 season and won’t be a free agent for another two years. The Jays were counting on him to be a key part of their outfield, and now he’s out for months.

It’s unclear if the Jays will try to cover for his loss in-house or if they’ll seek some help in the form of a trade.


If addiction is an illness — and it is — Josh Hamilton shouldn’t be suspended

josh hamilton getty

Hearing of Josh Hamilton’s relapse is heartbreaking. Whatever you think of him as a player or a person, there is no denying how far he has come and how hard he has worked to turn his life around.

Based on what’s been reported about those days, it’s amazing he didn’t die as a result of his drug use when he was a kid in the Rays’ organization. It’s even more amazing that he missed three full years of development time in the minors — his age 22, 23 and 24 seasons — yet still managed to come back and turn himself into one of the best players in baseball. His recovery has been astounding and inspirational.

But, as even a cursory review of addiction literature reveals, relapse is often — very often depending on various factors related to family history, occupation, etc. — a part of recovery. Hamilton’s has been no different. Since getting back on the baseball track in 2006-07, Hamilton has had at least two relapses that we are aware of. There may have been more. Take away his money and his fame, and his story is, I suspect, like that of a lot of addicts.

Hamilton’s future is now uncertain. Jon Heyman reported last night that some are speculating Hamilton will be put into a rehab program. Initial reports yesterday, however, suggested that Hamilton was in New York for “a disciplinary matter” and a good amount of conversation ensued regarding what sort of “suspension” Hamilton may get and how the Angels will not have to pay Hamilton while he is “suspended.”

We don’t yet know what Major League Baseball will do with Hamilton. I do hope, however, that whatever happens with him, it is not couched in disciplinary terms and is not treated like a suspension as we have come to know them (i.e. exile from team functions, forfeiture of salary, requirement of remediation/apology/etc.).  My knowledge and experience with addiction is pretty limited, but what I have read and what appears to be the case is that rehabilitative, as opposed to punitive measures are far more successful in limiting relapse among addicts. And what seems to be pretty clear is that talking about an addict’s relapses and the challenges he faces as if it were misbehavior, as opposed to illness, is counterproductive and potentially harmful.

Baseball’s assistance and substance abuse programs are said to be good and progressive. I trust that Hamilton will be steered into a situation that helps him get healthy again and helps him find the tools he once had at hand but has, apparently, lost and which have allowed him to overcome his addiction for so long. I do hope, however, that whatever rehabilitation and assistance he is provided is not paired with the usual trappings of punitive action. That whatever else they do to him beyond getting him into a good program does not contribute, inadvertently or otherwise, to the public’s tendency to treat addicts as miscreants or subjects to be shamed.

If that were to happen, I feel like it would be a bad message to send to baseball fans and the public at large, which is likely watching Hamilton’s struggle with addiction far more closely than it would a normal person’s struggle and thus may draw some bad overall conclusions about addiction from this episode. I also feel like it would probably be a bad thing for Josh Hamilton.

If any of you all have some experience or expertise regarding addiction, I’d ask that you weigh in in the comments. I’d be curious to hear some informed thoughts on this.