Getty Images

Mariners have contacted the Yankees, Mets about Robinson Cano

19 Comments

Ken Rosenthal’s latest notes column at The Athletic says that the Mariners — clearly in rebuild mode now — have contacted both the Yankees and the Mets in an effort to unload Robinson Cano and the $120 million he is still owed on his contract.

I’ll call that “Great Moments in Jerry Dipoto Shooting His Shot.” It’s admirable — asking is the right thing to do and, given Cano’s no-trade protection, they are two of the few teams you figure he’d approve trades to — but it’s almost certainly going to be an airball.

As Rosenthal notes, Cano is 36, spent half of last season on suspension and his future is almost certainly as a 1B/DH type. The Yankees could, theoretically, take Cano on and give him time at first base, but the money is more than they want to take on and the Mariners have already balked at taking back Jacoby Ellsbury as a financial offset. Also: while it seems reasonable to think that Cano could handle first, he has not had enough reps at first base to make anyone confident about it and the Yankees like to keep their DH slot open to rest regulars. The Mets, meanwhile, are not going to take on big salary and block prospects and don’t even have the benefit of the DH for Cano.

Cano hit well after coming back from his suspension, going .317/.363/.497 in 40 games in the second half. If I’m the Mariners, I plan on starting the season with him at second base while giving him looks at first as well, hope he continues to hit and that, if he does, he seems like a more attractive midseason acquisition for someone. Yeah, he’s expensive, but the Mariners have had him built into their budget for a long time and waiting things out a bit to try to save at least some of the money on him would make the most sense.

What do the losers of the Gerrit Cole derby do now?

8 Comments

Gerrit Cole is now a New York Yankee. Nine years and $324 million make that so. But though the Yankees are the only team who gets him, they weren’t the only team interested in him. So let’s take a look at what the losers of the Gerrit Cole derby — the Dodgers and the Angels — can do now that they know they’ve lost.

Dodgers

The Dodgers were hopeful they had a shot due to Cole’s Los Angeles ties. Welp, that didn’t pan out. Which is not a shock. I’m struggling to think of the last time that whole “he’s from [place] so he’ll want to sign with [team near place]” thing worked out. It didn’t happen with CC Sabathia in the Bay Area. It didn’t happen with Mark Teixeira in Baltimore. It didn’t even work out with Brandon Webb in Cincinnati. Money talks, geography walks.

But the Dodgers wanted Cole. They wanted to bolster a pitching staff that has relied on an aging and now free agent Rich Hill and on free agent Hyun-Jin Ryu. There’s a hole to fill, and without Cole available to fill that hole, they’ll have to do something. What is the something they can do?

How about sign their chief rival’s last big pitching star?

It’s certainly a decent plan. But it’s one that might get expensive for Los Angeles. USA Today reported on Monday that Bumgarner was seeking five years and $100 million-plus. Some raised their eyebrows at that report, but given how much Stephen Strasburg and Cole commanded, it seems downright reasonable now. That’s especially the case given that the Giants — despite being on the brink of a rebuild — probably don’t want to see their franchise hero sign with the hated Dodgers:

So it’ll be a bidding war. A war that will make Madison Bumgarner a very large amount of money.

 

Angels

The Angels made no secret of their desire to land Cole. Joe Maddon talked openly about him in his press conference here at the Winter Meetings on Monday. Cole talked openly during the 2019 season, and since it ended, about his connection to Orange County and the Big A.

But the Angels didn’t have the talent to entice Cole and to make him believe that they could contend like the Yankees can. If they made a competitive offer — and we don’t know if they did — they still would’ve had to convince him that they could win. And, really, there is no real basis to believe that they could make a credible case for that.

So where do the Angels go?

General Manager Billy Eppler said on Tuesday that the Angels did not have Gerrit Cole tunnel vision and that they could spend in excess of $20 million a year on multiple players, none of which had to be Cole. On Tuesday the Angels shed the contract of Zack Cozart and, with his $12 million+ and roster spot opened up, the Halos are said to be interested in third baseman Anthony Rendon or, as a fallback, Josh Donaldson.

As for pitching, the Angels will likely prove to be competition for  Bumgarner, Hyun-Jin Ryu and perhaps free agent Dallas Keuchel. They could also pursue trade options such as affordable pitchers like Miami’s Caleb Smith or Detroit’s Matthew Boyd or less-affordable — but less-costly in a trade — options like David Price, who the Red Sox were rumored to be shopping in the name of salary relief. Which is to say, the Angels have options, even if their top option is off the table.

But both they and their counterparts up in Los Angeles County, now have to go back to the drawing board now that Gerrit Cole is New York bound.