Joe Girardi gets redemption


The New York Yankees technically beat the Cleveland Indians three games to two in their best-of-five series, but it sure felt like they beat them four games to one. That was on Joe Girardi, of course, who today has to feel more relieved than he ever has been. Relieved because, if the ball had bounced a few different ways over the past several days and if the Indians had won, Girardi would be the biggest goat in New York sports in years. Maybe ever. He might even be out of a job.

This is due to his blunder in Game 2 when, in the sixth inning, with the Yankees leading 8-3, runners at the corners and two outs, Yankees reliever Chad Green grazed Lonnie Chisenhall‘s bat with a fastball. Home plate umpire Dan Iassogna called it a hit by pitch, but both catcher Gary Sanchez and slow-motion footage revealed the ball hit the bat and was likely a foul tip strikeout that would’ve ended the Indians’ rally. Girardi was cast into instant infamy for his failure to call for a replay review of the play, however, Chisenhall took first base and Francisco Lindor hit a grand slam, bringing the Indians back and, eventually, on to victory.

In the immediate aftermath Girardi made excuses — He didn’t want to take Green out of his rhythm! His replay tech didn’t have a definitive view! — but they weren’t convincing. After a night’s sleep, Girardi acknowledged that he messed up. While trying to maintain his positivity afterward, he did say later that “it was as difficult a loss as [he’s] had as a manager.”

He also noted that what happened in the remainder of the series would “determine the severity” of his blunder. He was certainly right about that. Because, as we sit here this morning, a mistake that even the least excitable Yankees fans I know suggested should cost Girardi his job is now beginning to form the narrative foundation of what is shaping up to be an improbably deep postseason run.

The Yankees won twice in The Bronx to get back to Cleveland and then finished off the series comeback by clobbering Corey Kluber, who is likely to take home the A.L. Cy Young hardware. All of that was impressive and all of that was attributable to Yankees players executing and, in some cases, taking their games to a whole new level. That play and those wins also take Girardi off the hook. If you don’t believe that, just listen to what Girardi’s boss, Brian Cashman, said after the game:

“This turns the page. The storyline changed. Instead of the focus maybe being on a mistake made that cost something, it’s not in the past and the focus is on a team winning something rather than an individual issue that occurred during a series. That’s why you want all these series to play out. You don’t want it because somebody made an error or made the wrong pitch. You want it to come out to be more about the success of the 25 guys, the manager, the coaching staff, the organization and they found a way to win versus being blamed for the loss.”

In the space of a few days, what looked like a job-ending mistake is now the basis for a “we battled adversity and came together as a team” narrative. It’s rare enough for the New York Yankees to be cast in that sort of role — when they win it’s because they’re supposed to win, not because they overcame anything — yet here we are.

Has any manager experienced such a dramatic change of fortune in so short a period of time as Joe Girardi has? I can’t think of one. It’s almost enough to make you think that all of this — the comeback and the redemption — is being written in advance someplace rather than just playing out in real time.

Sandy Alderson thinks Tim Tebow will play in the major leagues

Getty Images

Based on his track record so far I don’t think Tim Tebow deserves to play in the major leagues on the merits. Not even close. But then again, I’m not the general manager of the New York Mets, so I don’t get a say in that.

Sandy Alderson is the general manager, so his say carries a lot of weight. To that end, here’s what he said yesterday:

Noting the Tebow experiment has “evolved” into something greater, general manger Sandy Alderson on Sunday said, “I think he will play in the major leagues.”

To be fair, Alderson is pretty up front about the merits of Tebow’s presumed advancement to the bigs at some point. He didn’t say that it’s because Tebow has played his way up. He said this:

“He is great for the team, he is great for baseball, he was phenomenal for minor league baseball last year. The notion that he should have been excluded from the game because he is not coming through the traditional sources, I think is crazy. This is entertainment, too. And he quietly entertains us . . . He benefits the Mets because of how he conducts himself. He’s a tremendous representative of the organization.”

I take issue with Alderson’s comment about people thinking he shouldn’t be in the game because of his background. Most people who have been critical of the Tebow experiment have been critical because there is no evidence that he’s a good enough baseball player to be given the opportunities he’s been given. I mean, he advanced to high-A last year despite struggling at low-A and he’s going to start at Double-A this year in all likelihood despite struggling in high-A. If he does make the bigs, it will likewise come despite struggles in Double-A and maybe Triple-A too.

That said: I don’t mind if they promote Tebow all the way up as long as they’re being honest about why they’re doing it and aren’t trying to get everyone on board with some cockamamie idea that Tebow belongs on the baseball merits. If they do put him in the majors it’ll be because he’s a draw and a good promotion and because people generally like him and he’s not hurting anyone and I can’t take issue with that.

That’s basically what Alderson is saying here and if that’s the case, great. I mean, not great, because Tebow in the bigs will likely also mean that the Mets aren’t playing meaningful games, but great in the sense of “fine.” Baseball is entertainment too. No sense in pretending it isn’t.