On Thursday, Red Sox closer Craig Kimbrel threw the second immaculate inning of the 2017 season. An immaculate inning is when a pitcher strikes out the side on nine pitches — the minimum number of pitches required for three strikeouts.
Immaculate innings are interesting because they’re feats that are more rare than other, more popular feats like no-hitters and batters hitting for the cycle. Nationals starter Max Scherzer threw an immaculate inning against the Phillies on Sunday, becoming the 79th different pitcher to accomplish the feat, which has been done 84 times in total. There have been 252 no-hitters in the modern era (since 1901) and 307 cycles since 1882.
Scherzer gave up three runs on nine hits with no walks and eight strikeouts in six innings against the Phillies. The Nationals came from behind late to win 6-5. Scherzer is currently 4-2 with a 2.80 ERA and a 70/13 K/BB ratio in 54 2/3 innings. The reigning NL Cy Young Award winner is having another typically great season.
It’s can’t be easy being a Mets fan. Your team plays in the biggest city in America and should, theoretically, have big payrolls and always be in contention. They aren’t, however, partially because of horrendous luck and ill-timed injuries, partially because of poor baseball decisions and partially because the team’s ownership got taken down by a Ponzi scheme that, one would think anyway, sophisticated businessmen would recognize as a Ponzi scheme. We’ll leave that go, though.
What Mets fans are left with are (a) occasional windows of contention, such as we saw in 2014-16; (b) times of frustrating austerity on the part of ownership when, one would hope anyway, some money would be spent; (c) an inordinate focus on tabloidy and scandalous nonsense which just always seems to surround the club; and (c) a lot of disappointment.
You can file this latest bit under any of or many of the above categories, but it is uniquely Mets.
Team president Jeff Wilpon spoke to the press this afternoon about team payroll. In talking about payroll, David Wright‘s salary was included despite the fact that he may never play again and despite the fact that insurance is picking up most of the tab. Wilpon’s comment:
I’m guessing every team has a line item, someplace, about the costs of insurance. They’re businesses after all, and all businesses have to deal with that. They do not talk about it as a barrier to spending more money on players to the press, however, as they likely know that fans want to be told a story of hope and baseball-driven decisions heading into a new season and do not want to hear about all of the reasons the club will not spend any money despite sitting in a huge market.
This doesn’t change a thing about what the Mets were going to do or not do, but it does have the added bonus of making Mets fans roll their eyes and ask themselves what they did to deserve these owners. And that, more than almost anything, is the essence of Mets fandom these days.