“Moneyball” apparently explains Donald Trump

48 Comments

One of my least favorite things in political writing is when people try to shoehorn political narratives into quickie pop culture narratives. Stuff like “Donald Trump is like Voldemort and Hillary is like Hermione!” Or “How ‘Game of Thrones’ explains the 2016 election!” I get that such analogies can be fun. I certainly get that the people who write them do so in part because it may draw readers in (who among us has not written clickbait?) but as substantive political analysis, it’s reductive and silly for the most part.

Now baseball is getting its crack at the 2016 election. It does so in this Washington Post Op-Ed from Sonny Bunch which argues that the Trump campaign was playing “Moneyball” in defeating Clinton:

Of all the pieces of pop culture floating around, the one that might best help those searching for an explanation for Donald Trump’s victory is a 13-year-old book about baseball strategy: Michael Lewis’s “Moneyball” . . . If there’s anything that the political market is full of, it’s inefficiencies. And the Trump team, to its credit, understood just that.

I don’t have a substantive criticism of anything Bunch argues there. There is certainly a surface appeal. His analysis of how everyone misread “Moneyball” at first is also a topic I’ll never tire of revisiting.

I think, however, that like anything else along these lines, it’s reductive. There will be reams of scholarship written about the 2016 election in the coming years and, I suspect, it will result in lessons and insights that go beyond an 800-word analogy to a popular baseball/business book. All but the most basic phenomena occur due to a complex interaction of multiple factors, plus chance, plus mistakes, plus opportunism, making for a complex stew which defies such easy explanations. And that’s before you bring Russian hackers and the vagaries of public opinion polling into it.

Mostly, though, I think this sort of analysis falls prey to the same sort of flaw from which analysis in any arena — baseball included — often suffers: the inability to appreciate that more than one thing can be true.

A strong team can choke but the inferior team can also play better. A player can be overrated but he can also still be good. Financial inequality between teams can help the richer team but the richer team can also have smarter executives. The decision to steal second base can be stupid yet nonetheless successful. A political campaign can do dumb things but still win or could do smart things and still lose. There are a lot of factors in play in everything this side of coin tosses.

So, sure, the “Moneyball” analogy is fun. But I think it’s less enlightening than the author here — or the author of any other quickie “here’s what happened!” piece —  wants it to seem.

Besides, if your go-to baseball book for 2016 isn’t “Veeck as in Wreck” I don’t even know what you’re talking about in the first place.

The Tigers are trying to convert Anthony Gose into a pitcher

Getty Images
Leave a comment

Tigers’ center fielder Anthony Gose wants to try his hand at pitching, according to comments made by manager Brad Ausmus on Sunday. Gose is poised to start the year in Triple-A Toledo after receiving a midseason demotion to Double-A last summer following an altercation with Triple-A manager Lloyd McClendon.

While the experiment won’t detract from Gose’s outfield work in Triple-A, the 26-year-old is expected to take on additional bullpen sessions throughout the year. According to MLB.com’s Jason Beck, the left-handed hitter last took the mound in high school, where his fastball was clocked as fast as 97 m.p.h. Gose ultimately rejected the idea of starting his professional career as a pitcher, despite receiving favorable assessments from scouts.

Ausmus said the idea first surfaced at the end of the 2016 season. It appears to be a fallback option for the outfielder, who has struggled at the plate over his five-year career in the majors. Via Chris McCosky of the Detroit News:

Doolittle in Oakland did it and he was in the big leagues a couple of years later,” Ausmus said. “It’s going to take some time. He’s going to have to be a sponge and catch up on experience fast. But we feel it’s worth investigating.

Stephen Strasburg is the Nationals’ Opening Day starter

Getty Images
Leave a comment

Nationals’ right-hander Stephen Strasburg will take the mound for the club on Opening Day, manager Dusty Baker said on Sunday. The news is hardly surprising given Max Scherzer’s questionable status this spring, though it had yet to be confirmed by the club.

Strasburg is approaching his eighth run with the club in 2017. He went 15-4 in 2016, finishing the year with a 3.60 ERA, 2.7 BB/9 and 11.2 SO/9 in 147 2/3 innings. This will mark his fourth Opening Day assignment with the Nationals.

Scherzer, the Nationals’ Opening Day starter in both 2015 and 2016, is scheduled to make his season debut sometime during the first week of the season. The right-hander is expected to take things more slowly this spring as he finishes rehabbing a stress fracture in his finger.

The Nationals will open their season against the Marlins on April 3.