The decision isn’t up to the players, but Red Sox right-hander Jake Peavy had an interesting comment on free agent shortstop Stephen Drew this morning:
The Red Sox haven’t officially closed the door on Drew, but Alex Speier of WEEI.com hears that it would likely be limited to a one-year deal or one-year deal with a player option which could help the team for luxury tax purposes. Otherwise, top prospect Xander Bogaerts will take over at shortstop.
If Drew wants a guaranteed multi-year contract, he’ll likely have to get it elsewhere, but it’s tough to see where he gets it at the moment. The Mets continue to downplay the chances of a match while the Yankees reportedly aren’t interested despite an obvious need for depth.
Drew, who turns 31 in March, hit .253/.333/.443 with 13 home runs and 67 RBI in 124 games for the World Series champions last year while playing excellent defense at shortstop. He declined a one-year, $14.1 million qualifying offer from Boston in order to test free agency, so he is attached to draft pick compensation.
Kristie Ackert of the New York Daily News reports that the Mets have discussed a trade involving starter Matt Harvey with at least two teams. Apparently, the Mets were even willing to move Harvey for a reliever.
The Mets tendered Harvey a contract on December 1. He’s entering his third and final year of arbitration eligibility and will likely see a slight bump from last season’s salary of $5.125 million. As a result, there was some thought going into late November that the Mets would non-tender Harvey.
Harvey, 28, made 18 starts and one relief appearance last year and had horrendous results. He put up a 6.70 ERA with a 67/47 K/BB ratio in 92 2/3 innings. Between his performance, his impending free agency, and his injury history, the Mets aren’t likely to get much back in return for Harvey. Even expecting a reliever in return may be too lofty.
Along with bullpen help, the Mets also need help at second base, first base, and the outfield. They don’t have many resources with which to address those needs. Ackert described the Mets’ resources as “a very limited stash of prospects” and “limited payroll space.”