UPDATE: The Mets signed Rick Ankiel to a one-year contract

24 Comments

UPDATE: It’s a done deal, complete with the team’s plans for his playing time:

Bonus fun: he chose number 16 because he was a big Doc Gooden fan back in the day.

4PM: One would have thought that when the Houston Astros, the worst team in baseball, had no more use for Rick Ankiel that his career might be over. But never underestimate the power of specialization. For while the Astros are the worst overall team, the Mets may very well have the very worst outfield. And that, my friends, presents an opportunity for Mr. Ankiel.

Jon Heyman reports that the Mets are “in talks on a deal” for Ankiel, though it is not known if it’s serious or imminent or whatever.

Ankiel was hitting a paltry .194 with a .234 on-base percentage and had a miserable 35/3 K/BB ratio in 65 plate appearances when Houston released him. He did have five homers, though, so maybe he can find a place on the Mets.

Report: Mets have discussed a Matt Harvey trade with at least two teams

Al Bello/Getty Images
1 Comment

Kristie Ackert of the New York Daily News reports that the Mets have discussed a trade involving starter Matt Harvey with at least two teams. Apparently, the Mets were even willing to move Harvey for a reliever.

The Mets tendered Harvey a contract on December 1. He’s entering his third and final year of arbitration eligibility and will likely see a slight bump from last season’s salary of $5.125 million. As a result, there was some thought going into late November that the Mets would non-tender Harvey.

Harvey, 28, made 18 starts and one relief appearance last year and had horrendous results. He put up a 6.70 ERA with a 67/47 K/BB ratio in 92 2/3 innings. Between his performance, his impending free agency, and his injury history, the Mets aren’t likely to get much back in return for Harvey. Even expecting a reliever in return may be too lofty.

Along with bullpen help, the Mets also need help at second base, first base, and the outfield. They don’t have many resources with which to address those needs. Ackert described the Mets’ resources as “a very limited stash of prospects” and “limited payroll space.”