Going into the clubhouse and asking a manager who just lost the World Series if he is coming back next year is kinda like asking the widow at a funeral if she plans on remarrying. So it was understandable that Jim Leyland was not ready to talk about that stuff on Sunday night. Give it a day, though:
The decision has been made.
Indications are that Jim Leyland is coming back for an eighth year of managing the Tigers and that the club could make the announcement as early as today.
That’s Tom Gage of the Detroit News with the story. UPDATE: It’s official.
It makes sense. This will be a substantially similar team coming back next season and there is no better person than Leyland to manage it.
Leyland has bee at the helm for seven years. He’s 607-528 with two pennants and two division titles under his belt with the Tigers. You have to figure he’ll have this job as long as the Cabrera-Verlander-Fielder core is in tact and competitive.
Kristie Ackert of the New York Daily News reports that the Mets have discussed a trade involving starter Matt Harvey with at least two teams. Apparently, the Mets were even willing to move Harvey for a reliever.
The Mets tendered Harvey a contract on December 1. He’s entering his third and final year of arbitration eligibility and will likely see a slight bump from last season’s salary of $5.125 million. As a result, there was some thought going into late November that the Mets would non-tender Harvey.
Harvey, 28, made 18 starts and one relief appearance last year and had horrendous results. He put up a 6.70 ERA with a 67/47 K/BB ratio in 92 2/3 innings. Between his performance, his impending free agency, and his injury history, the Mets aren’t likely to get much back in return for Harvey. Even expecting a reliever in return may be too lofty.
Along with bullpen help, the Mets also need help at second base, first base, and the outfield. They don’t have many resources with which to address those needs. Ackert described the Mets’ resources as “a very limited stash of prospects” and “limited payroll space.”