I do believe this would be a first: Japanese player returns to MLB after previously returning to Japan.
That’s what former Red Sox reliever Hideki Okajima is looking to do after posting a 0.94 ERA in 47 2/3 innings for the SoftBank Hawks in 2012.
Of course, Okajima never wanted to go back to pitching in Japan in the first place. He signed a minor league deal with the Yankees last spring, only to have the contract voided because of an undisclosed physical issue. As it turns out, he probably would have been pretty useful had the Yankees kept him around.
Okajima, who turns 37 in December, had a 3.11 ERA in 246 1/3 innings for the Red Sox between 2007-11. He hasn’t really been a successful big-league reliever since 2009, but as long as he’s willing to take a minor league contract, there will probably be at least a few teams interested in his services.
Last year Pete Rose field a defamation lawsuit against attorney John Dowd after Dowd gave a radio interview in which he said that Rose had sexual relations with underage girls that amounted to “statutory rape, every time.” Today Rose dismissed the suit.
In a statement issued by Rose’s lawyer and Dowd’s lawyer, the parties say they agreed “based on mutual consideration, to the dismissal with prejudice of Mr. Rose’s lawsuit against Mr. Dowd.” They say they can’t comment further.
Dowd, of course, is the man who conducted the investigation into Rose’s gambling which resulted in the Hit King being placed on baseball’s permanently ineligible list back in 1989. The two have sparred through the media sporadically over the years, with Rose disputing Dowd’s findings despite agreeing to his ban back in 1989. Rose has changed his story about his gambling many times, usually when he had an opportunity to either make money off of it, like when he wrote his autobiography, or when he sought, unsuccessfully, to be reinstated to baseball. Dowd has stood by his report ever since it was released.
In the wake of Dowd’s radio comments in 2015, a woman came forward to say that she and Rose had a sexual relationship when she was under the age of 16, seemingly confirming Dowd’s assertion and forming the basis for a strong defense of Rose’s claims (truth is a total defense to a defamation claim). They seem now, however, to have buried the hatchet. Or at least buried the litigation.
That leaves Dowd more free time to defend his latest client, President Trump. And Rose more time to do whatever it is Pete Rose does with his time.