There’s a fine line between being colorful and being a jerk

31 Comments

Indians closer Chris Perez has a reputation for being a colorful, say-anything-at-any-time kind of guy.  But you know what? Even though that wears well enough on a winning team, it wears awfully on a losing team.  Just take his post game interview from yesterday:

Reporter: How have you managed to stay sharp between save opportunities?

Perez: “I’ve had a lot of practice this year …

…  Reporter: What’s been your routine because you wouldn’t expect to go six, seven or eight games between save opportunities?

Perez: “Have you watched us this year? We haven’t been in seven or eight games in a row.”

Truth? Sure. But when a closer talks about his team not being in games so that he hasn’t had save opportunities, I can’t imagine his teammates appreciate it.

And keep in mind: this is a Chris Perez who has decided not to say much to the media as the season ends due to some other recent controversial comments.  Indeed, he ended this interview by saying “It will be a fun last couple of days of the season when I’m allowed to talk again.”

I imagine his teammates figure he already talks too much.

The Hall of Fame rejected the BBWAA vote to make ballots public

Getty Images
Leave a comment

Last year, at the Winter Meetings, the BBWAA voted overwhelmingly to make Hall of Fame ballots public beginning with this year’s election. Their as a long-demanded one, and it served to make a process that has often frustrated fans — and many voters — more transparent.

Mark Feinsand of MLB.com tweeted a few minutes ago, however, that at some point since last December, the Hall of Fame rejected the BBWAA’s vote. Writer may continue to release their own ballots, but their votes will not automatically be made public.

I don’t know what the rationale could possibly be for the Hall of Fame. If I had to guess, I’d say that the less-active BBWAA voters who either voted against that change or who weren’t present for it because they don’t go to the Winter Meetings complained about it. It’s likewise possible that the Hall simply doesn’t want anyone talking about the votes and voters so as not to take attention away from the honorees and the institution, but that train left the station years ago. If the Hall doesn’t want people talking about votes and voters, they’d have to change the whole thing to some star chamber kind of process in which the voters themselves aren’t even known and no one discusses it publicly until after the results are released.

Oh well. There’s a lot the Hall of Fame does that doesn’t make a ton of sense. Add this to the list.