Chris Parmelee parlayed a great September call-up into an Opening Day job with the Twins, but then predictably struggled making the jump from Double-A to the majors and was demoted back to the minors after hitting .179 in 27 games.
He took the demotion in stride and then some, hitting .375 with four homers, four doubles, and a 1.208 OPS in 15 games at Triple-A, and today the Twins recalled the 24-year-old first baseman.
At the end of his first stint in Minnesota this season Parmelee was only playing sporadically, so hopefully this time around manager Ron Gardenhire writes him into the lineup consistently so he can continue to develop even if he doesn’t immediately take the American League by storm like he did the International League.
To make room for Parmelee’s return the Twins optioned Cole De Vries to Triple-A, but at least the 27-year-old career minor leaguer and former undrafted free agent picked up a big-league victory.
Last year Pete Rose field a defamation lawsuit against attorney John Dowd after Dowd gave a radio interview in which he said that Rose had sexual relations with underage girls that amounted to “statutory rape, every time.” Today Rose dismissed the suit.
In a statement issued by Rose’s lawyer and Dowd’s lawyer, the parties say they agreed “based on mutual consideration, to the dismissal with prejudice of Mr. Rose’s lawsuit against Mr. Dowd.” They say they can’t comment further.
Dowd, of course, is the man who conducted the investigation into Rose’s gambling which resulted in the Hit King being placed on baseball’s permanently ineligible list back in 1989. The two have sparred through the media sporadically over the years, with Rose disputing Dowd’s findings despite agreeing to his ban back in 1989. Rose has changed his story about his gambling many times, usually when he had an opportunity to either make money off of it, like when he wrote his autobiography, or when he sought, unsuccessfully, to be reinstated to baseball. Dowd has stood by his report ever since it was released.
In the wake of Dowd’s radio comments in 2015, a woman came forward to say that she and Rose had a sexual relationship when she was under the age of 16, seemingly confirming Dowd’s assertion and forming the basis for a strong defense of Rose’s claims (truth is a total defense to a defamation claim). They seem now, however, to have buried the hatchet. Or at least buried the litigation.
That leaves Dowd more free time to defend his latest client, President Trump. And Rose more time to do whatever it is Pete Rose does with his time.