In ATH this morning we mentioned that in yesterday’s Padres-Dodgers game home plate umpire Dale Scott held his hands up suggesting “dead ball” on the play that resulted in that 2-5-6-3 double play. The runners all froze at the hand signals, assuming the play was dead.
The play was reviewed by Major League Baseball, and here’s the official statement from senior vice president of baseball operations, Peter Woodfork:
“After review and discussion with the umpire, we have determined that the call itself of a fair ball was correct. However, while making the call, there was an incorrect mechanic, which appeared to confuse San Diego’s base runners. At no time did the umpire verbally kill the play on the field. After reviewing the entire situation following the game, the umpire realizes his hands were in an exaggerated upward appearance similar to a call that would indicate a dead ball. While we all agree that it was a fair ball that did not hit the batter, the umpire recognizes that the proper mechanic was not executed as he tried to avoid the catcher.”
Hurm. Given the likelihood that verbal rulings might not be heard by baserunners in a loud stadium, one would think that the hand signals should trump what the ump says (or in this case doesn’t say, which is “foul ball”).
But I would assume ruling in such a fashion would have required a replay of the ninth inning of yesterday’s game, yes? And that baseball wouldn’t really want to do that.