There was a lot of chatter during the Mets-Reds game wondering if Jose Reyes’ early, batting title-preserving exit from the game was Jose Reyes taking himself out or if it was a team thing. Or some mixture of the two, perhaps with Terry Collins doing Reyes a solid or something like that.
Seems it was the former: Terry Collins said right after the game was over that it was Reyes’ decision to take himself out and that he felt the need to honor Reyes’ wishes. I didn’t hear his exact words, but here’s how Adam Rubin of ESPN New York tweeted it:
Terry Collins said he earned players’ respect this year and didn’t want to disregard Jose’s wishes and lose any respect in clubhouse.
Odd way to put it, but Twitter isn’t the best medium for conveying nuance. I think I grok the meaning, though: what possible point is there in fighting Reyes on the matter in the middle of game 162?
Either way, it sorta has me rooting for Ryan Braun to get a lot of hits tonight.
Last year Pete Rose field a defamation lawsuit against attorney John Dowd after Dowd gave a radio interview in which he said that Rose had sexual relations with underage girls that amounted to “statutory rape, every time.” Today Rose dismissed the suit.
In a statement issued by Rose’s lawyer and Dowd’s lawyer, the parties say they agreed “based on mutual consideration, to the dismissal with prejudice of Mr. Rose’s lawsuit against Mr. Dowd.” They say they can’t comment further.
Dowd, of course, is the man who conducted the investigation into Rose’s gambling which resulted in the Hit King being placed on baseball’s permanently ineligible list back in 1989. The two have sparred through the media sporadically over the years, with Rose disputing Dowd’s findings despite agreeing to his ban back in 1989. Rose has changed his story about his gambling many times, usually when he had an opportunity to either make money off of it, like when he wrote his autobiography, or when he sought, unsuccessfully, to be reinstated to baseball. Dowd has stood by his report ever since it was released.
In the wake of Dowd’s radio comments in 2015, a woman came forward to say that she and Rose had a sexual relationship when she was under the age of 16, seemingly confirming Dowd’s assertion and forming the basis for a strong defense of Rose’s claims (truth is a total defense to a defamation claim). They seem now, however, to have buried the hatchet. Or at least buried the litigation.
That leaves Dowd more free time to defend his latest client, President Trump. And Rose more time to do whatever it is Pete Rose does with his time.