Most trials never start when they’re supposed to due to all kinds of pretrial wrangling and stuff. But that’s not the case with Roger Clemens. Today the law firm that could have appealed the order granting Clemens access to the Mitchell Report notes decided not to appeal, thereby clearing the way for baseball’s second biggest steroid/perjury/former superstar criminal trial to get underway on July 6th.
We’ll obviously get way more into it as the opening statements draw near, but for those who care and lost track: my view is that Clemens is in way, way, way deeper doo-doo than Bonds was. This is because, unlike Bonds, another witness and possibly multiple witnesses will take the stand in his case and will say, under oath, that Clemens lied. Which kind of matters in a perjury case.
Is it a perfect case? No. Brian McNamee will be subject to a rigorous cross-examination based on the fact that he frequently lied in the past when it suited his interests to do so. But he also can explain why he did that (i.e. to keep his meal ticket, Clemens, out of trouble), and that’s a somewhat understandable reason for lying from his perspective. And it’s counterbalanced, of course, by the fact that Clemens will be portrayed as having ample reason to lie at the time, what with his career and then-good reputation to protect.
The best use of government resources? Nah. But given that Clemens’ own conduct and public relations onslaught — and not a crazy-obsessed government investigation — fomented the proceedings in which the alleged perjury took place, I have way less of a problem with this than I did with the Bonds prosecution.