I tend to think that as the BBWAA gets younger and as more and more steroid era candidates come on the ballot, the writers will ease up a bit and start letting players associated with PED-use — or merely suspected of it — into the Hall. Buster Olney writes something this morning, however, that gives me pause:
There is a perception that as time goes on there will be a softening towards the steroid-era candidates — the players suspected of using performance-enhancing drugs. I disagree with that, strongly, because what has been happening in recent years is that voters are setting their personal precedents — from which few will deviate.
Voters change their mind on players quite often, but do they change their minds on these sorts of principles? I’m somewhat skeptical that they do and I fear that Olney’s words may be prophetic.